mirror of
https://github.com/github/octodns.git
synced 2024-05-11 05:55:00 +00:00
2712 lines
96 KiB
Python
2712 lines
96 KiB
Python
#
|
|
#
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import absolute_import, division, print_function, \
|
|
unicode_literals
|
|
|
|
from collections import defaultdict
|
|
from mock import call, patch
|
|
from ns1.rest.errors import AuthException, RateLimitException, \
|
|
ResourceException
|
|
from six import text_type
|
|
from unittest import TestCase
|
|
|
|
from octodns.record import Delete, Record, Update
|
|
from octodns.provider.ns1 import Ns1Client, Ns1Exception, Ns1Provider
|
|
from octodns.provider.plan import Plan
|
|
from octodns.zone import Zone
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestNs1Provider(TestCase):
|
|
zone = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
expected = set()
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, '', {
|
|
'ttl': 32,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, 'foo', {
|
|
'ttl': 33,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'values': ['1.2.3.4', '1.2.3.5'],
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, 'geo', {
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'values': ['101.102.103.104', '101.102.103.105'],
|
|
'geo': {'NA-US-NY': ['201.202.203.204']},
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, 'cname', {
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
'type': 'CNAME',
|
|
'value': 'foo.unit.tests.',
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, '', {
|
|
'ttl': 35,
|
|
'type': 'MX',
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'preference': 10,
|
|
'exchange': 'mx1.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'preference': 20,
|
|
'exchange': 'mx2.unit.tests.',
|
|
}]
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, 'naptr', {
|
|
'ttl': 36,
|
|
'type': 'NAPTR',
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'flags': 'U',
|
|
'order': 100,
|
|
'preference': 100,
|
|
'regexp': '!^.*$!sip:info@bar.example.com!',
|
|
'replacement': '.',
|
|
'service': 'SIP+D2U',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'flags': 'S',
|
|
'order': 10,
|
|
'preference': 100,
|
|
'regexp': '!^.*$!sip:info@bar.example.com!',
|
|
'replacement': '.',
|
|
'service': 'SIP+D2U',
|
|
}]
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, '', {
|
|
'ttl': 37,
|
|
'type': 'NS',
|
|
'values': ['ns1.unit.tests.', 'ns2.unit.tests.'],
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, '_srv._tcp', {
|
|
'ttl': 38,
|
|
'type': 'SRV',
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'priority': 10,
|
|
'weight': 20,
|
|
'port': 30,
|
|
'target': 'foo-1.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'priority': 12,
|
|
'weight': 30,
|
|
'port': 30,
|
|
'target': 'foo-2.unit.tests.',
|
|
}]
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, 'sub', {
|
|
'ttl': 39,
|
|
'type': 'NS',
|
|
'values': ['ns3.unit.tests.', 'ns4.unit.tests.'],
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, '', {
|
|
'ttl': 40,
|
|
'type': 'CAA',
|
|
'value': {
|
|
'flags': 0,
|
|
'tag': 'issue',
|
|
'value': 'ca.unit.tests',
|
|
},
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, 'urlfwd', {
|
|
'ttl': 41,
|
|
'type': 'URLFWD',
|
|
'value': {
|
|
'path': '/',
|
|
'target': 'http://foo.unit.tests',
|
|
'code': 301,
|
|
'masking': 2,
|
|
'query': 0,
|
|
},
|
|
}))
|
|
expected.add(Record.new(zone, '1.2.3.4', {
|
|
'ttl': 42,
|
|
'type': 'PTR',
|
|
'values': ['one.one.one.one.', 'two.two.two.two.'],
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
ns1_records = [{
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'ttl': 32,
|
|
'short_answers': ['1.2.3.4'],
|
|
'domain': 'unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'ttl': 33,
|
|
'short_answers': ['1.2.3.4', '1.2.3.5'],
|
|
'domain': 'foo.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
'short_answers': ['101.102.103.104', '101.102.103.105'],
|
|
'domain': 'geo.unit.tests',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'CNAME',
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
'short_answers': ['foo.unit.tests'],
|
|
'domain': 'cname.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'MX',
|
|
'ttl': 35,
|
|
'short_answers': ['10 mx1.unit.tests.', '20 mx2.unit.tests'],
|
|
'domain': 'unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'NAPTR',
|
|
'ttl': 36,
|
|
'short_answers': [
|
|
'10 100 S SIP+D2U !^.*$!sip:info@bar.example.com! .',
|
|
'100 100 U SIP+D2U !^.*$!sip:info@bar.example.com! .'
|
|
],
|
|
'domain': 'naptr.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'NS',
|
|
'ttl': 37,
|
|
'short_answers': ['ns1.unit.tests.', 'ns2.unit.tests'],
|
|
'domain': 'unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'SRV',
|
|
'ttl': 38,
|
|
'short_answers': ['12 30 30 foo-2.unit.tests.',
|
|
'10 20 30 foo-1.unit.tests'],
|
|
'domain': '_srv._tcp.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'NS',
|
|
'ttl': 39,
|
|
'short_answers': ['ns3.unit.tests.', 'ns4.unit.tests'],
|
|
'domain': 'sub.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'CAA',
|
|
'ttl': 40,
|
|
'short_answers': ['0 issue ca.unit.tests'],
|
|
'domain': 'unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'URLFWD',
|
|
'ttl': 41,
|
|
'short_answers': ['/ http://foo.unit.tests 301 2 0'],
|
|
'domain': 'urlfwd.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'type': 'PTR',
|
|
'ttl': 42,
|
|
'short_answers': ['one.one.one.one.', 'two.two.two.two.'],
|
|
'domain': '1.2.3.4.unit.tests.',
|
|
}]
|
|
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.records.Records.retrieve')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.zones.Zones.retrieve')
|
|
def test_populate(self, zone_retrieve_mock, record_retrieve_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
def reset():
|
|
provider._client.reset_caches()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
|
|
# Bad auth
|
|
reset()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = AuthException('unauthorized')
|
|
zone = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthException) as ctx:
|
|
provider.populate(zone)
|
|
self.assertEquals(zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect, ctx.exception)
|
|
|
|
# General error
|
|
reset()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ResourceException('boom')
|
|
zone = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
with self.assertRaises(ResourceException) as ctx:
|
|
provider.populate(zone)
|
|
self.assertEquals(zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect, ctx.exception)
|
|
self.assertEquals(('unit.tests',), zone_retrieve_mock.call_args[0])
|
|
|
|
# Non-existent zone doesn't populate anything
|
|
reset()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = \
|
|
ResourceException('server error: zone not found')
|
|
zone = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
exists = provider.populate(zone)
|
|
self.assertEquals(set(), zone.records)
|
|
self.assertEquals(('unit.tests',), zone_retrieve_mock.call_args[0])
|
|
self.assertFalse(exists)
|
|
|
|
# Existing zone w/o records
|
|
reset()
|
|
ns1_zone = {
|
|
'records': [{
|
|
"domain": "geo.unit.tests",
|
|
"zone": "unit.tests",
|
|
"type": "A",
|
|
"answers": [
|
|
{'answer': ['1.1.1.1'], 'meta': {}},
|
|
{'answer': ['1.2.3.4'],
|
|
'meta': {'ca_province': ['ON']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['2.3.4.5'], 'meta': {'us_state': ['NY']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['3.4.5.6'], 'meta': {'country': ['US']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['4.5.6.7'],
|
|
'meta': {'iso_region_code': ['NA-US-WA']}},
|
|
],
|
|
'tier': 3,
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
}],
|
|
}
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [ns1_zone]
|
|
# Its tier 3 so we'll do a full lookup
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ns1_zone['records']
|
|
zone = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
provider.populate(zone)
|
|
self.assertEquals(1, len(zone.records))
|
|
self.assertEquals(('unit.tests',), zone_retrieve_mock.call_args[0])
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests',
|
|
'geo.unit.tests', 'A')])
|
|
|
|
# Existing zone w/records
|
|
reset()
|
|
ns1_zone = {
|
|
'records': self.ns1_records + [{
|
|
"domain": "geo.unit.tests",
|
|
"zone": "unit.tests",
|
|
"type": "A",
|
|
"answers": [
|
|
{'answer': ['1.1.1.1'], 'meta': {}},
|
|
{'answer': ['1.2.3.4'],
|
|
'meta': {'ca_province': ['ON']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['2.3.4.5'], 'meta': {'us_state': ['NY']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['3.4.5.6'], 'meta': {'country': ['US']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['4.5.6.7'],
|
|
'meta': {'iso_region_code': ['NA-US-WA']}},
|
|
],
|
|
'tier': 3,
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
}],
|
|
}
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [ns1_zone]
|
|
# Its tier 3 so we'll do a full lookup
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ns1_zone['records']
|
|
zone = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
provider.populate(zone)
|
|
self.assertEquals(self.expected, zone.records)
|
|
self.assertEquals(('unit.tests',), zone_retrieve_mock.call_args[0])
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests',
|
|
'geo.unit.tests', 'A')])
|
|
|
|
# Test skipping unsupported record type
|
|
reset()
|
|
ns1_zone = {
|
|
'records': self.ns1_records + [{
|
|
'type': 'UNSUPPORTED',
|
|
'ttl': 42,
|
|
'short_answers': ['unsupported'],
|
|
'domain': 'unsupported.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
"domain": "geo.unit.tests",
|
|
"zone": "unit.tests",
|
|
"type": "A",
|
|
"answers": [
|
|
{'answer': ['1.1.1.1'], 'meta': {}},
|
|
{'answer': ['1.2.3.4'],
|
|
'meta': {'ca_province': ['ON']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['2.3.4.5'], 'meta': {'us_state': ['NY']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['3.4.5.6'], 'meta': {'country': ['US']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['4.5.6.7'],
|
|
'meta': {'iso_region_code': ['NA-US-WA']}},
|
|
],
|
|
'tier': 3,
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
}],
|
|
}
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [ns1_zone]
|
|
zone = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
provider.populate(zone)
|
|
self.assertEquals(self.expected, zone.records)
|
|
self.assertEquals(('unit.tests',), zone_retrieve_mock.call_args[0])
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests',
|
|
'geo.unit.tests', 'A')])
|
|
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.records.Records.delete')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.records.Records.update')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.records.Records.create')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.records.Records.retrieve')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.zones.Zones.create')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.zones.Zones.retrieve')
|
|
def test_sync(self, zone_retrieve_mock, zone_create_mock,
|
|
record_retrieve_mock, record_create_mock,
|
|
record_update_mock, record_delete_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
desired = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
for r in self.expected:
|
|
desired.add_record(r)
|
|
|
|
plan = provider.plan(desired)
|
|
# everything except the root NS
|
|
expected_n = len(self.expected) - 1
|
|
self.assertEquals(expected_n, len(plan.changes))
|
|
self.assertTrue(plan.exists)
|
|
|
|
def reset():
|
|
provider._client.reset_caches()
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
zone_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
|
|
# Fails, general error
|
|
reset()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ResourceException('boom')
|
|
with self.assertRaises(ResourceException) as ctx:
|
|
provider.apply(plan)
|
|
self.assertEquals(zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect, ctx.exception)
|
|
|
|
# Fails, bad auth
|
|
reset()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = \
|
|
ResourceException('server error: zone not found')
|
|
zone_create_mock.side_effect = AuthException('unauthorized')
|
|
with self.assertRaises(AuthException) as ctx:
|
|
provider.apply(plan)
|
|
self.assertEquals(zone_create_mock.side_effect, ctx.exception)
|
|
|
|
# non-existent zone, create
|
|
reset()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = \
|
|
ResourceException('server error: zone not found')
|
|
|
|
zone_create_mock.side_effect = ['foo']
|
|
# Test out the create rate-limit handling, then successes for the rest
|
|
record_create_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
RateLimitException('boo', period=0),
|
|
] + ([None] * len(self.expected))
|
|
|
|
got_n = provider.apply(plan)
|
|
self.assertEquals(expected_n, got_n)
|
|
|
|
# Zone was created
|
|
zone_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests')])
|
|
# Checking that we got some of the expected records too
|
|
record_create_mock.assert_has_calls([
|
|
call('unit.tests', 'unit.tests', 'A', answers=[
|
|
{'answer': ['1.2.3.4'], 'meta': {}}
|
|
], filters=[], ttl=32),
|
|
call('unit.tests', 'unit.tests', 'CAA', answers=[
|
|
(0, 'issue', 'ca.unit.tests')
|
|
], ttl=40),
|
|
call('unit.tests', 'unit.tests', 'MX', answers=[
|
|
(10, 'mx1.unit.tests.'), (20, 'mx2.unit.tests.')
|
|
], ttl=35),
|
|
call('unit.tests', '1.2.3.4.unit.tests', 'PTR', answers=[
|
|
'one.one.one.one.', 'two.two.two.two.',
|
|
], ttl=42),
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
# Update & delete
|
|
reset()
|
|
|
|
ns1_zone = {
|
|
'records': self.ns1_records + [{
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'ttl': 42,
|
|
'short_answers': ['9.9.9.9'],
|
|
'domain': 'delete-me.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, {
|
|
"domain": "geo.unit.tests",
|
|
"zone": "unit.tests",
|
|
"type": "A",
|
|
"short_answers": [
|
|
'1.1.1.1',
|
|
'1.2.3.4',
|
|
'2.3.4.5',
|
|
'3.4.5.6',
|
|
'4.5.6.7',
|
|
],
|
|
'tier': 3, # This flags it as advacned, full load required
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
}],
|
|
}
|
|
ns1_zone['records'][0]['short_answers'][0] = '2.2.2.2'
|
|
|
|
ns1_record = {
|
|
"domain": "geo.unit.tests",
|
|
"zone": "unit.tests",
|
|
"type": "A",
|
|
"answers": [
|
|
{'answer': ['1.1.1.1'], 'meta': {}},
|
|
{'answer': ['1.2.3.4'],
|
|
'meta': {'ca_province': ['ON']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['2.3.4.5'], 'meta': {'us_state': ['NY']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['3.4.5.6'], 'meta': {'country': ['US']}},
|
|
{'answer': ['4.5.6.7'],
|
|
'meta': {'iso_region_code': ['NA-US-WA']}},
|
|
],
|
|
'tier': 3,
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [ns1_record, ns1_record]
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [ns1_zone, ns1_zone]
|
|
plan = provider.plan(desired)
|
|
self.assertEquals(3, len(plan.changes))
|
|
# Shouldn't rely on order so just count classes
|
|
classes = defaultdict(lambda: 0)
|
|
for change in plan.changes:
|
|
classes[change.__class__] += 1
|
|
self.assertEquals(1, classes[Delete])
|
|
self.assertEquals(2, classes[Update])
|
|
|
|
record_update_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
RateLimitException('one', period=0),
|
|
None,
|
|
None,
|
|
]
|
|
record_delete_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
RateLimitException('two', period=0),
|
|
None,
|
|
None,
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [ns1_record, ns1_record]
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [ns1_zone, ns1_zone]
|
|
got_n = provider.apply(plan)
|
|
self.assertEquals(3, got_n)
|
|
|
|
record_update_mock.assert_has_calls([
|
|
call('unit.tests', 'unit.tests', 'A', answers=[
|
|
{'answer': ['1.2.3.4'], 'meta': {}}],
|
|
filters=[],
|
|
ttl=32),
|
|
call('unit.tests', 'unit.tests', 'A', answers=[
|
|
{'answer': ['1.2.3.4'], 'meta': {}}],
|
|
filters=[],
|
|
ttl=32),
|
|
call('unit.tests', 'geo.unit.tests', 'A', answers=[
|
|
{'answer': ['101.102.103.104'], 'meta': {}},
|
|
{'answer': ['101.102.103.105'], 'meta': {}},
|
|
{
|
|
'answer': ['201.202.203.204'],
|
|
'meta': {'iso_region_code': ['NA-US-NY']}
|
|
}],
|
|
filters=[
|
|
{'filter': 'shuffle', 'config': {}},
|
|
{'filter': 'geotarget_country', 'config': {}},
|
|
{'filter': 'select_first_n', 'config': {'N': 1}}],
|
|
ttl=34)
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
def test_escaping(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
record = {
|
|
'ttl': 31,
|
|
'short_answers': ['foo; bar baz; blip']
|
|
}
|
|
self.assertEquals(['foo\\; bar baz\\; blip'],
|
|
provider._data_for_SPF('SPF', record)['values'])
|
|
|
|
record = {
|
|
'ttl': 31,
|
|
'short_answers': ['no', 'foo; bar baz; blip', 'yes']
|
|
}
|
|
self.assertEquals(['no', 'foo\\; bar baz\\; blip', 'yes'],
|
|
provider._data_for_TXT('TXT', record)['values'])
|
|
|
|
zone = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
record = Record.new(zone, 'spf', {
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
'type': 'SPF',
|
|
'value': 'foo\\; bar baz\\; blip'
|
|
})
|
|
params, _ = provider._params_for_SPF(record)
|
|
self.assertEquals(['foo; bar baz; blip'], params['answers'])
|
|
|
|
record = Record.new(zone, 'txt', {
|
|
'ttl': 35,
|
|
'type': 'TXT',
|
|
'value': 'foo\\; bar baz\\; blip'
|
|
})
|
|
params, _ = provider._params_for_SPF(record)
|
|
self.assertEquals(['foo; bar baz; blip'], params['answers'])
|
|
|
|
def test_data_for_CNAME(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# answers from ns1
|
|
a_record = {
|
|
'ttl': 31,
|
|
'type': 'CNAME',
|
|
'short_answers': ['foo.unit.tests.']
|
|
}
|
|
a_expected = {
|
|
'ttl': 31,
|
|
'type': 'CNAME',
|
|
'value': 'foo.unit.tests.'
|
|
}
|
|
self.assertEqual(a_expected,
|
|
provider._data_for_CNAME(a_record['type'], a_record))
|
|
|
|
# no answers from ns1
|
|
b_record = {
|
|
'ttl': 32,
|
|
'type': 'CNAME',
|
|
'short_answers': []
|
|
}
|
|
b_expected = {
|
|
'ttl': 32,
|
|
'type': 'CNAME',
|
|
'value': None
|
|
}
|
|
self.assertEqual(b_expected,
|
|
provider._data_for_CNAME(b_record['type'], b_record))
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
|
zone = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
|
|
def record(self):
|
|
# return a new object each time so we can mess with it without causing
|
|
# problems from test to test
|
|
return Record.new(self.zone, '', {
|
|
'dynamic': {
|
|
'pools': {
|
|
'lhr': {
|
|
'fallback': 'iad',
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'value': '3.4.5.6',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
'iad': {
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'value': '2.3.4.5',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'rules': [{
|
|
'geos': [
|
|
'AF',
|
|
'EU-GB',
|
|
'NA-US-FL'
|
|
],
|
|
'pool': 'lhr',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'geos': [
|
|
'AF-ZW',
|
|
],
|
|
'pool': 'iad',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'pool': 'iad',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
'octodns': {
|
|
'healthcheck': {
|
|
'host': 'send.me',
|
|
'path': '/_ping',
|
|
'port': 80,
|
|
'protocol': 'HTTP',
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'ttl': 32,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
def aaaa_record(self):
|
|
return Record.new(self.zone, '', {
|
|
'dynamic': {
|
|
'pools': {
|
|
'lhr': {
|
|
'fallback': 'iad',
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'value': '::ffff:3.4.5.6',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
'iad': {
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'value': '::ffff:1.2.3.4',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'value': '::ffff:2.3.4.5',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'rules': [{
|
|
'geos': [
|
|
'AF',
|
|
'EU-GB',
|
|
'NA-US-FL'
|
|
],
|
|
'pool': 'lhr',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'geos': [
|
|
'AF-ZW',
|
|
],
|
|
'pool': 'iad',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'pool': 'iad',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
'octodns': {
|
|
'healthcheck': {
|
|
'host': 'send.me',
|
|
'path': '/_ping',
|
|
'port': 80,
|
|
'protocol': 'HTTP',
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'ttl': 32,
|
|
'type': 'AAAA',
|
|
'value': '::ffff:1.2.3.4',
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
def cname_record(self):
|
|
return Record.new(self.zone, 'foo', {
|
|
'dynamic': {
|
|
'pools': {
|
|
'iad': {
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'value': 'iad.unit.tests.',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'rules': [{
|
|
'pool': 'iad',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
'octodns': {
|
|
'healthcheck': {
|
|
'host': 'send.me',
|
|
'path': '/_ping',
|
|
'port': 80,
|
|
'protocol': 'HTTP',
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'ttl': 33,
|
|
'type': 'CNAME',
|
|
'value': 'value.unit.tests.',
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
def test_notes(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEquals({}, provider._parse_notes(None))
|
|
self.assertEquals({}, provider._parse_notes(''))
|
|
self.assertEquals({}, provider._parse_notes('blah-blah-blah'))
|
|
|
|
# Round tripping
|
|
data = {
|
|
'key': 'value',
|
|
'priority': '1',
|
|
}
|
|
notes = provider._encode_notes(data)
|
|
self.assertEquals(data, provider._parse_notes(notes))
|
|
|
|
def test_monitors_for(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-populate the client's monitors cache
|
|
monitor_one = {
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'host': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
},
|
|
'notes': 'host:unit.tests type:A',
|
|
}
|
|
monitor_four = {
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'host': '2.3.4.5',
|
|
},
|
|
'notes': 'host:unit.tests type:A',
|
|
}
|
|
monitor_five = {
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'host': 'iad.unit.tests',
|
|
},
|
|
'notes': 'host:foo.unit.tests type:CNAME',
|
|
}
|
|
provider._client._monitors_cache = {
|
|
'one': monitor_one,
|
|
'two': {
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'host': '8.8.8.8',
|
|
},
|
|
'notes': 'host:unit.tests type:AAAA',
|
|
},
|
|
'three': {
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'host': '9.9.9.9',
|
|
},
|
|
'notes': 'host:other.unit.tests type:A',
|
|
},
|
|
'four': monitor_four,
|
|
'five': monitor_five,
|
|
'six': {
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'host': '10.10.10.10',
|
|
},
|
|
'notes': 'non-conforming notes',
|
|
},
|
|
'seven': {
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'host': '11.11.11.11',
|
|
},
|
|
'notes': None,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# Would match, but won't get there b/c it's not dynamic
|
|
record = Record.new(self.zone, '', {
|
|
'ttl': 32,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
})
|
|
self.assertEquals({}, provider._monitors_for(record))
|
|
|
|
# Will match some records
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'1.2.3.4': monitor_one,
|
|
'2.3.4.5': monitor_four,
|
|
}, provider._monitors_for(self.record()))
|
|
|
|
# Check match for CNAME values
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'iad.unit.tests.': monitor_five,
|
|
}, provider._monitors_for(self.cname_record()))
|
|
|
|
def test_uuid(self):
|
|
# Just a smoke test/for coverage
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
self.assertTrue(provider._uuid())
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._uuid')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.data.Feed.create')
|
|
def test_feed_create(self, datafeed_create_mock, uuid_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {}
|
|
|
|
uuid_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
datafeed_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
uuid_mock.side_effect = ['xxxxxxxxxxxxxx']
|
|
feed = {
|
|
'id': 'feed',
|
|
}
|
|
datafeed_create_mock.side_effect = [feed]
|
|
monitor = {
|
|
'id': 'one',
|
|
'name': 'one name',
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'host': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
},
|
|
'notes': 'host:unit.tests type:A',
|
|
}
|
|
self.assertEquals('feed', provider._feed_create(monitor))
|
|
datafeed_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call('foo', 'one name - xxxxxx',
|
|
{'jobid': 'one'})])
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._feed_create')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Client.monitors_create')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Client.notifylists_create')
|
|
def test_monitor_create(self, notifylists_create_mock,
|
|
monitors_create_mock, feed_create_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {}
|
|
|
|
notifylists_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
feed_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
notifylists_create_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'id': 'nl-id',
|
|
}]
|
|
monitors_create_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'id': 'mon-id',
|
|
}]
|
|
feed_create_mock.side_effect = ['feed-id']
|
|
monitor = {
|
|
'name': 'test monitor',
|
|
}
|
|
provider._client._notifylists_cache = {}
|
|
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_create(monitor)
|
|
self.assertEquals('mon-id', monitor_id)
|
|
self.assertEquals('feed-id', feed_id)
|
|
monitors_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call(name='test monitor',
|
|
notify_list='nl-id')])
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._feed_create')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Client.monitors_create')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Client._try')
|
|
def test_monitor_create_shared_notifylist(self, try_mock,
|
|
monitors_create_mock,
|
|
feed_create_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key', shared_notifylist=True)
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {}
|
|
|
|
# First time we'll need to create the share list
|
|
provider._client._notifylists_cache = {}
|
|
try_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
feed_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
try_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'id': 'nl-id',
|
|
'name': provider.SHARED_NOTIFYLIST_NAME,
|
|
}]
|
|
monitors_create_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'id': 'mon-id',
|
|
}]
|
|
feed_create_mock.side_effect = ['feed-id']
|
|
monitor = {
|
|
'name': 'test monitor',
|
|
}
|
|
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_create(monitor)
|
|
self.assertEquals('mon-id', monitor_id)
|
|
self.assertEquals('feed-id', feed_id)
|
|
monitors_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call(name='test monitor',
|
|
notify_list='nl-id')])
|
|
try_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
# The shared notifylist should be cached now
|
|
self.assertEquals([provider.SHARED_NOTIFYLIST_NAME],
|
|
list(provider._client._notifylists_cache.keys()))
|
|
|
|
# Second time we'll use the cached version
|
|
try_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
feed_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_create_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'id': 'mon-id',
|
|
}]
|
|
feed_create_mock.side_effect = ['feed-id']
|
|
monitor = {
|
|
'name': 'test monitor',
|
|
}
|
|
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_create(monitor)
|
|
self.assertEquals('mon-id', monitor_id)
|
|
self.assertEquals('feed-id', feed_id)
|
|
monitors_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call(name='test monitor',
|
|
notify_list='nl-id')])
|
|
try_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
def test_monitor_gen(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
value = '3.4.5.6'
|
|
record = self.record()
|
|
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(record, value)
|
|
self.assertEquals(value, monitor['config']['host'])
|
|
self.assertTrue('\\nHost: send.me\\r' in monitor['config']['send'])
|
|
self.assertFalse(monitor['config']['ssl'])
|
|
self.assertEquals('host:unit.tests type:A', monitor['notes'])
|
|
|
|
record._octodns['healthcheck']['host'] = None
|
|
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(record, value)
|
|
self.assertTrue(r'\nHost: 3.4.5.6\r' in monitor['config']['send'])
|
|
|
|
record._octodns['healthcheck']['protocol'] = 'HTTPS'
|
|
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(record, value)
|
|
self.assertTrue(monitor['config']['ssl'])
|
|
|
|
record._octodns['healthcheck']['protocol'] = 'TCP'
|
|
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(record, value)
|
|
# No http send done
|
|
self.assertFalse('send' in monitor['config'])
|
|
# No http response expected
|
|
self.assertFalse('rules' in monitor)
|
|
|
|
def test_monitor_gen_AAAA(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
value = '::ffff:3.4.5.6'
|
|
record = self.aaaa_record()
|
|
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(record, value)
|
|
self.assertTrue(monitor['config']['ipv6'])
|
|
|
|
def test_monitor_gen_CNAME(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
value = 'iad.unit.tests.'
|
|
record = self.cname_record()
|
|
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(record, value)
|
|
self.assertEquals(value[:-1], monitor['config']['host'])
|
|
|
|
def test_monitor_is_match(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# Empty matches empty
|
|
self.assertTrue(provider._monitor_is_match({}, {}))
|
|
|
|
# Anything matches empty
|
|
self.assertTrue(provider._monitor_is_match({}, {
|
|
'anything': 'goes'
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
# Missing doesn't match
|
|
self.assertFalse(provider._monitor_is_match({
|
|
'exepct': 'this',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'anything': 'goes'
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
# Identical matches
|
|
self.assertTrue(provider._monitor_is_match({
|
|
'exepct': 'this',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'exepct': 'this',
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
# Different values don't match
|
|
self.assertFalse(provider._monitor_is_match({
|
|
'exepct': 'this',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'exepct': 'that',
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
# Different sub-values don't match
|
|
self.assertFalse(provider._monitor_is_match({
|
|
'exepct': {
|
|
'this': 'to-be',
|
|
},
|
|
}, {
|
|
'exepct': {
|
|
'this': 'something-else',
|
|
},
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._feed_create')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Client.monitors_update')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_create')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_gen')
|
|
def test_monitor_sync(self, monitor_gen_mock, monitor_create_mock,
|
|
monitors_update_mock, feed_create_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {
|
|
'mon-id': 'feed-id',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
def reset():
|
|
feed_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitor_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitor_gen_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_update_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
|
|
# No existing monitor
|
|
reset()
|
|
monitor_gen_mock.side_effect = [{'key': 'value'}]
|
|
monitor_create_mock.side_effect = [('mon-id', 'feed-id')]
|
|
value = '1.2.3.4'
|
|
record = self.record()
|
|
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(record, value, None)
|
|
self.assertEquals('mon-id', monitor_id)
|
|
self.assertEquals('feed-id', feed_id)
|
|
monitor_gen_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record, value)])
|
|
monitor_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call({'key': 'value'})])
|
|
monitors_update_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
feed_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Existing monitor that doesn't need updates
|
|
reset()
|
|
monitor = {
|
|
'id': 'mon-id',
|
|
'key': 'value',
|
|
'name': 'monitor name',
|
|
}
|
|
monitor_gen_mock.side_effect = [monitor]
|
|
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(record, value,
|
|
monitor)
|
|
self.assertEquals('mon-id', monitor_id)
|
|
self.assertEquals('feed-id', feed_id)
|
|
monitor_gen_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
monitor_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
monitors_update_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
feed_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Existing monitor that doesn't need updates, but is missing its feed
|
|
reset()
|
|
monitor = {
|
|
'id': 'mon-id2',
|
|
'key': 'value',
|
|
'name': 'monitor name',
|
|
}
|
|
monitor_gen_mock.side_effect = [monitor]
|
|
feed_create_mock.side_effect = ['feed-id2']
|
|
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(record, value,
|
|
monitor)
|
|
self.assertEquals('mon-id2', monitor_id)
|
|
self.assertEquals('feed-id2', feed_id)
|
|
monitor_gen_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
monitor_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
monitors_update_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
feed_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call(monitor)])
|
|
|
|
# Existing monitor that needs updates
|
|
reset()
|
|
monitor = {
|
|
'id': 'mon-id',
|
|
'key': 'value',
|
|
'name': 'monitor name',
|
|
}
|
|
gened = {
|
|
'other': 'thing',
|
|
}
|
|
monitor_gen_mock.side_effect = [gened]
|
|
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(record, value,
|
|
monitor)
|
|
self.assertEquals('mon-id', monitor_id)
|
|
self.assertEquals('feed-id', feed_id)
|
|
monitor_gen_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
monitor_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
monitors_update_mock.assert_has_calls([call('mon-id', other='thing')])
|
|
feed_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Client.notifylists_delete')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Client.monitors_delete')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Client.datafeed_delete')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
|
def test_monitors_gc(self, monitors_for_mock, datafeed_delete_mock,
|
|
monitors_delete_mock, notifylists_delete_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {
|
|
'mon-id': 'feed-id',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
def reset():
|
|
datafeed_delete_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_delete_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
|
|
# No active monitors and no existing, nothing will happen
|
|
reset()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{}]
|
|
record = self.record()
|
|
provider._monitors_gc(record)
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
|
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
monitors_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# No active monitors and one existing, delete all the things
|
|
reset()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'x': {
|
|
'id': 'mon-id',
|
|
'notify_list': 'nl-id',
|
|
}
|
|
}]
|
|
provider._client._notifylists_cache = {
|
|
'not shared': {
|
|
'id': 'nl-id',
|
|
'name': 'not shared',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
provider._monitors_gc(record)
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
|
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('foo', 'feed-id')])
|
|
monitors_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('mon-id')])
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('nl-id')])
|
|
|
|
# Same existing, this time in active list, should be noop
|
|
reset()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'x': {
|
|
'id': 'mon-id',
|
|
'notify_list': 'nl-id',
|
|
}
|
|
}]
|
|
provider._monitors_gc(record, {'mon-id'})
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
|
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
monitors_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Non-active monitor w/o a feed, and another monitor that's left alone
|
|
# b/c it's active
|
|
reset()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'x': {
|
|
'id': 'mon-id',
|
|
'notify_list': 'nl-id',
|
|
},
|
|
'y': {
|
|
'id': 'mon-id2',
|
|
'notify_list': 'nl-id2',
|
|
},
|
|
}]
|
|
provider._client._notifylists_cache = {
|
|
'not shared': {
|
|
'id': 'nl-id',
|
|
'name': 'not shared',
|
|
},
|
|
'not shared 2': {
|
|
'id': 'nl-id2',
|
|
'name': 'not shared 2',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
provider._monitors_gc(record, {'mon-id'})
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
|
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
monitors_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('mon-id2')])
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('nl-id2')])
|
|
|
|
# Non-active monitor w/o a notifylist, generally shouldn't happen, but
|
|
# code should handle it just in case someone gets clicky in the UI
|
|
reset()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'y': {
|
|
'id': 'mon-id2',
|
|
'notify_list': 'nl-id2',
|
|
},
|
|
}]
|
|
provider._client._notifylists_cache = {
|
|
'not shared a': {
|
|
'id': 'nl-ida',
|
|
'name': 'not shared a',
|
|
},
|
|
'not shared b': {
|
|
'id': 'nl-idb',
|
|
'name': 'not shared b',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
provider._monitors_gc(record, {'mon-id'})
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
|
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
monitors_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('mon-id2')])
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Non-active monitor with a shared notifylist, monitor deleted, but
|
|
# notifylist is left alone
|
|
reset()
|
|
provider.shared_notifylist = True
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'y': {
|
|
'id': 'mon-id2',
|
|
'notify_list': 'shared',
|
|
},
|
|
}]
|
|
provider._client._notifylists_cache = {
|
|
'shared': {
|
|
'id': 'shared',
|
|
'name': provider.SHARED_NOTIFYLIST_NAME,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
provider._monitors_gc(record, {'mon-id'})
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
|
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
monitors_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('mon-id2')])
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_sync')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
|
def test_params_for_dynamic_region_only(self, monitors_for_mock,
|
|
monitor_sync_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {
|
|
'mon-id': 'feed-id',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# provider._params_for_A() calls provider._monitors_for() and
|
|
# provider._monitor_sync(). Mock their return values so that we don't
|
|
# make NS1 API calls during tests
|
|
monitors_for_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitor_sync_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'3.4.5.6': 'mid-3',
|
|
}]
|
|
monitor_sync_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
('mid-1', 'fid-1'),
|
|
('mid-2', 'fid-2'),
|
|
('mid-3', 'fid-3'),
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
record = self.record()
|
|
rule0 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][0]
|
|
rule1 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][1]
|
|
rule0['geos'] = ['AF', 'EU']
|
|
rule1['geos'] = ['AS']
|
|
ret, monitor_ids = provider._params_for_A(record)
|
|
self.assertEquals(10, len(ret['answers']))
|
|
self.assertEquals(ret['filters'],
|
|
Ns1Provider._FILTER_CHAIN_WITH_REGION(provider,
|
|
True))
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'iad__catchall': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:2'
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'iad__georegion': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'georegion': ['ASIAPAC'],
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:1'
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'lhr__georegion': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'georegion': ['AFRICA', 'EUROPE'],
|
|
'note': 'fallback:iad rule-order:0'
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}, ret['regions'])
|
|
self.assertEquals({'mid-1', 'mid-2', 'mid-3'}, monitor_ids)
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_sync')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
|
def test_params_for_dynamic_state_only(self, monitors_for_mock,
|
|
monitor_sync_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {
|
|
'mon-id': 'feed-id',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# provider._params_for_A() calls provider._monitors_for() and
|
|
# provider._monitor_sync(). Mock their return values so that we don't
|
|
# make NS1 API calls during tests
|
|
monitors_for_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitor_sync_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'3.4.5.6': 'mid-3',
|
|
}]
|
|
monitor_sync_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
('mid-1', 'fid-1'),
|
|
('mid-2', 'fid-2'),
|
|
('mid-3', 'fid-3'),
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
record = self.record()
|
|
rule0 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][0]
|
|
rule1 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][1]
|
|
rule0['geos'] = ['AF', 'EU']
|
|
rule1['geos'] = ['NA-US-CA', 'NA-CA-NL']
|
|
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(record)
|
|
self.assertEquals(10, len(ret['answers']))
|
|
exp = Ns1Provider._FILTER_CHAIN_WITH_REGION_AND_COUNTRY(provider,
|
|
True)
|
|
self.assertEquals(ret['filters'], exp)
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'iad__catchall': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:2'
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'iad__country': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:1',
|
|
'us_state': ['CA'],
|
|
'ca_province': ['NL']
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'lhr__georegion': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'georegion': ['AFRICA', 'EUROPE'],
|
|
'note': 'fallback:iad rule-order:0'
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}, ret['regions'])
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_sync')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
|
def test_params_for_dynamic_contient_and_countries(self,
|
|
monitors_for_mock,
|
|
monitor_sync_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {
|
|
'mon-id': 'feed-id',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# provider._params_for_A() calls provider._monitors_for() and
|
|
# provider._monitor_sync(). Mock their return values so that we don't
|
|
# make NS1 API calls during tests
|
|
provider._client.reset_caches()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitor_sync_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'3.4.5.6': 'mid-3',
|
|
}]
|
|
monitor_sync_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
('mid-1', 'fid-1'),
|
|
('mid-2', 'fid-2'),
|
|
('mid-3', 'fid-3'),
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
record = self.record()
|
|
rule0 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][0]
|
|
rule1 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][1]
|
|
rule0['geos'] = ['AF', 'EU', 'NA-US-CA']
|
|
rule1['geos'] = ['AS', 'AS-IN']
|
|
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(record)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEquals(17, len(ret['answers']))
|
|
# Deeply check the answers we have here
|
|
# group the answers based on where they came from
|
|
notes = defaultdict(list)
|
|
for answer in ret['answers']:
|
|
notes[answer['meta']['note']].append(answer)
|
|
# Remove the meta and region part since it'll vary based on the
|
|
# exact pool, that'll let us == them down below
|
|
del answer['meta']
|
|
del answer['region']
|
|
|
|
# Expected groups. iad has occurances in here: a country and region
|
|
# that was split out based on targeting a continent and a state. It
|
|
# finally has a catchall. Those are examples of the two ways pools get
|
|
# expanded.
|
|
#
|
|
# lhr splits in two, with a region and country and includes a fallback
|
|
#
|
|
# All values now include their own `pool:` name
|
|
#
|
|
# well as both lhr georegion (for contients) and country. The first is
|
|
# an example of a repeated target pool in a rule (only allowed when the
|
|
# 2nd is a catchall.)
|
|
self.assertEquals(['fallback: from:iad__catchall pool:iad',
|
|
'fallback: from:iad__country pool:iad',
|
|
'fallback: from:iad__georegion pool:iad',
|
|
'fallback: from:lhr__country pool:iad',
|
|
'fallback: from:lhr__georegion pool:iad',
|
|
'fallback:iad from:lhr__country pool:lhr',
|
|
'fallback:iad from:lhr__georegion pool:lhr',
|
|
'from:--default--'],
|
|
sorted(notes.keys()))
|
|
|
|
# All the iad's should match (after meta and region were removed)
|
|
self.assertEquals(notes['from:iad__catchall'],
|
|
notes['from:iad__country'])
|
|
self.assertEquals(notes['from:iad__catchall'],
|
|
notes['from:iad__georegion'])
|
|
|
|
# The lhrs should match each other too
|
|
self.assertEquals(notes['from:lhr__georegion'],
|
|
notes['from:lhr__country'])
|
|
|
|
# We have both country and region filter chain entries
|
|
exp = Ns1Provider._FILTER_CHAIN_WITH_REGION_AND_COUNTRY(provider,
|
|
True)
|
|
self.assertEquals(ret['filters'], exp)
|
|
|
|
# and our region details match the expected behaviors/targeting
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'iad__catchall': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:2'
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'iad__country': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'country': ['IN'],
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:1'
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'iad__georegion': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'georegion': ['ASIAPAC'],
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:1'
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'lhr__country': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'fallback:iad rule-order:0',
|
|
'us_state': ['CA']
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'lhr__georegion': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'georegion': ['AFRICA', 'EUROPE'],
|
|
'note': 'fallback:iad rule-order:0'
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}, ret['regions'])
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_sync')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
|
def test_params_for_dynamic_oceania(self, monitors_for_mock,
|
|
monitor_sync_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {
|
|
'mon-id': 'feed-id',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# provider._params_for_A() calls provider._monitors_for() and
|
|
# provider._monitor_sync(). Mock their return values so that we don't
|
|
# make NS1 API calls during tests
|
|
monitors_for_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitor_sync_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'3.4.5.6': 'mid-3',
|
|
}]
|
|
monitor_sync_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
('mid-1', 'fid-1'),
|
|
('mid-2', 'fid-2'),
|
|
('mid-3', 'fid-3'),
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
# Set geos to 'OC' in rules[0] (pool - 'lhr')
|
|
# Check returned dict has list of countries under 'OC'
|
|
record = self.record()
|
|
rule0 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][0]
|
|
rule0['geos'] = ['OC']
|
|
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(record)
|
|
|
|
# Make sure the country list expanded into all the OC countries
|
|
got = set(ret['regions']['lhr__country']['meta']['country'])
|
|
self.assertEquals(got,
|
|
Ns1Provider._CONTINENT_TO_LIST_OF_COUNTRIES['OC'])
|
|
|
|
# When rules has 'OC', it is converted to list of countries in the
|
|
# params. Look if the returned filters is the filter chain with country
|
|
self.assertEquals(ret['filters'],
|
|
Ns1Provider._FILTER_CHAIN_WITH_COUNTRY(provider,
|
|
True))
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_sync')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
|
def test_params_for_dynamic(self, monitors_for_mock, monitors_sync_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {
|
|
'mon-id': 'feed-id',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
monitors_for_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_sync_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'3.4.5.6': 'mid-3',
|
|
}]
|
|
monitors_sync_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
('mid-1', 'fid-1'),
|
|
('mid-2', 'fid-2'),
|
|
('mid-3', 'fid-3'),
|
|
]
|
|
# This indirectly calls into _params_for_dynamic and tests the
|
|
# handling to get there
|
|
record = self.record()
|
|
# copy an existing answer from a different pool to 'lhr' so
|
|
# in order to test answer repetition across pools (monitor reuse)
|
|
record.dynamic._data()['pools']['lhr']['values'].append(
|
|
record.dynamic._data()['pools']['iad']['values'][0])
|
|
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(record)
|
|
|
|
# Given that record has both country and region in the rules,
|
|
# the returned filter chain should be one with region and country
|
|
self.assertEquals(ret['filters'],
|
|
Ns1Provider._FILTER_CHAIN_WITH_REGION_AND_COUNTRY(
|
|
provider, True))
|
|
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
|
monitors_sync_mock.assert_has_calls([
|
|
call(record, '1.2.3.4', None),
|
|
call(record, '2.3.4.5', None),
|
|
call(record, '3.4.5.6', 'mid-3'),
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
record = Record.new(self.zone, 'geo', {
|
|
'ttl': 34,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'values': ['101.102.103.104', '101.102.103.105'],
|
|
'geo': {'EU': ['201.202.203.204']},
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
})
|
|
params, _ = provider._params_for_geo_A(record)
|
|
self.assertEquals([], params['filters'])
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_sync')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
|
def test_params_for_dynamic_CNAME(self, monitors_for_mock,
|
|
monitor_sync_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
|
# elsewhere)
|
|
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {
|
|
'mon-id': 'feed-id',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# provider._params_for_A() calls provider._monitors_for() and
|
|
# provider._monitor_sync(). Mock their return values so that we don't
|
|
# make NS1 API calls during tests
|
|
monitors_for_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitor_sync_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'iad.unit.tests.': 'mid-1',
|
|
}]
|
|
monitor_sync_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
('mid-1', 'fid-1'),
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
record = self.cname_record()
|
|
ret, _ = provider._params_for_CNAME(record)
|
|
|
|
# Check if the default value was correctly read and populated
|
|
# All other dynamic record test cases are covered by dynamic_A tests
|
|
self.assertEquals(ret['answers'][-1]['answer'][0], 'value.unit.tests.')
|
|
|
|
def test_data_for_dynamic(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# Unexpected filters throws an error
|
|
ns1_record = {
|
|
'domain': 'unit.tests',
|
|
'filters': [],
|
|
}
|
|
with self.assertRaises(Ns1Exception) as ctx:
|
|
provider._data_for_dynamic('A', ns1_record)
|
|
self.assertEquals('Unrecognized advanced record',
|
|
text_type(ctx.exception))
|
|
|
|
# empty record turns into empty data
|
|
ns1_record = {
|
|
'answers': [],
|
|
'domain': 'unit.tests',
|
|
'filters': Ns1Provider._BASIC_FILTER_CHAIN(provider, True),
|
|
'regions': {},
|
|
'ttl': 42,
|
|
}
|
|
data = provider._data_for_dynamic('A', ns1_record)
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'dynamic': {
|
|
'pools': {},
|
|
'rules': [],
|
|
},
|
|
'ttl': 42,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'values': [],
|
|
}, data)
|
|
|
|
# Test out a small, but realistic setup that covers all the options
|
|
# We have country and region in the test config
|
|
filters = provider._get_updated_filter_chain(True, True)
|
|
catchall_pool_name = 'iad__catchall'
|
|
ns1_record = {
|
|
'answers': [{
|
|
'answer': ['3.4.5.6'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 1,
|
|
'note': 'from:lhr__country',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'lhr',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['2.3.4.5'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 2,
|
|
'weight': 12,
|
|
'note': 'from:iad',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'lhr',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['1.2.3.4'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 3,
|
|
'note': 'from:--default--',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'lhr',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['2.3.4.5'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 1,
|
|
'weight': 12,
|
|
'note': 'from:iad',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'iad',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['1.2.3.4'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 2,
|
|
'note': 'from:--default--',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'iad',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['2.3.4.5'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 1,
|
|
'weight': 12,
|
|
'note': 'from:{}'.format(catchall_pool_name),
|
|
},
|
|
'region': catchall_pool_name,
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['1.2.3.4'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 2,
|
|
'note': 'from:--default--',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': catchall_pool_name,
|
|
}],
|
|
'domain': 'unit.tests',
|
|
'filters': filters,
|
|
'regions': {
|
|
# lhr will use the new-split style names (and that will require
|
|
# combining in the code to produce the expected answer
|
|
'lhr__georegion': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:1 fallback:iad',
|
|
'georegion': ['AFRICA'],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'lhr__country': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:1 fallback:iad',
|
|
'country': ['MX'],
|
|
'us_state': ['OR'],
|
|
'ca_province': ['NL']
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
# iad will use the old style "plain" region naming. We won't
|
|
# see mixed names like this in practice, but this should
|
|
# exercise both paths
|
|
'iad': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:2',
|
|
'country': ['ZW'],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
catchall_pool_name: {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:3',
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'tier': 3,
|
|
'ttl': 42,
|
|
}
|
|
data = provider._data_for_dynamic('A', ns1_record)
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'dynamic': {
|
|
'pools': {
|
|
'iad': {
|
|
'fallback': None,
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'value': '2.3.4.5',
|
|
'weight': 12,
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
'lhr': {
|
|
'fallback': 'iad',
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'weight': 1,
|
|
'value': '3.4.5.6',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'rules': [{
|
|
'_order': '1',
|
|
'geos': [
|
|
'AF',
|
|
'NA-CA-NL',
|
|
'NA-MX',
|
|
'NA-US-OR'
|
|
],
|
|
'pool': 'lhr',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'_order': '2',
|
|
'geos': [
|
|
'AF-ZW',
|
|
],
|
|
'pool': 'iad',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'_order': '3',
|
|
'pool': 'iad',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
'ttl': 42,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'values': ['1.2.3.4'],
|
|
}, data)
|
|
|
|
# Same answer if we go through _data_for_A which out sources the job to
|
|
# _data_for_dynamic
|
|
data2 = provider._data_for_A('A', ns1_record)
|
|
self.assertEquals(data, data2)
|
|
|
|
# Same answer if we have an old-style catchall name
|
|
old_style_catchall_pool_name = 'catchall__iad'
|
|
ns1_record['answers'][-2]['region'] = old_style_catchall_pool_name
|
|
ns1_record['answers'][-1]['region'] = old_style_catchall_pool_name
|
|
ns1_record['regions'][old_style_catchall_pool_name] = \
|
|
ns1_record['regions'][catchall_pool_name]
|
|
del ns1_record['regions'][catchall_pool_name]
|
|
data3 = provider._data_for_dynamic('A', ns1_record)
|
|
self.assertEquals(data, data2)
|
|
|
|
# Oceania test cases
|
|
# 1. Full list of countries should return 'OC' in geos
|
|
oc_countries = Ns1Provider._CONTINENT_TO_LIST_OF_COUNTRIES['OC']
|
|
ns1_record['regions']['lhr__country']['meta']['country'] = \
|
|
list(oc_countries)
|
|
data3 = provider._data_for_A('A', ns1_record)
|
|
self.assertTrue('OC' in data3['dynamic']['rules'][0]['geos'])
|
|
|
|
# 2. Partial list of countries should return just those
|
|
partial_oc_cntry_list = list(oc_countries)[:5]
|
|
ns1_record['regions']['lhr__country']['meta']['country'] = \
|
|
partial_oc_cntry_list
|
|
data4 = provider._data_for_A('A', ns1_record)
|
|
for c in partial_oc_cntry_list:
|
|
self.assertTrue(
|
|
'OC-{}'.format(c) in data4['dynamic']['rules'][0]['geos'])
|
|
|
|
# NA test cases
|
|
# 1. Full list of countries should return 'NA' in geos
|
|
na_countries = Ns1Provider._CONTINENT_TO_LIST_OF_COUNTRIES['NA']
|
|
del ns1_record['regions']['lhr__country']['meta']['us_state']
|
|
ns1_record['regions']['lhr__country']['meta']['country'] = \
|
|
list(na_countries)
|
|
data5 = provider._data_for_A('A', ns1_record)
|
|
self.assertTrue('NA' in data5['dynamic']['rules'][0]['geos'])
|
|
|
|
# 2. Partial list of countries should return just those
|
|
partial_na_cntry_list = list(na_countries)[:5] + ['SX', 'UM']
|
|
ns1_record['regions']['lhr__country']['meta']['country'] = \
|
|
partial_na_cntry_list
|
|
data6 = provider._data_for_A('A', ns1_record)
|
|
for c in partial_na_cntry_list:
|
|
self.assertTrue(
|
|
'NA-{}'.format(c) in data6['dynamic']['rules'][0]['geos'])
|
|
|
|
# Test out fallback only pools and new-style notes
|
|
ns1_record = {
|
|
'answers': [{
|
|
'answer': ['1.1.1.1'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 1,
|
|
'note': 'from:one__country pool:one fallback:two',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'one_country',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['2.2.2.2'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 2,
|
|
'note': 'from:one__country pool:two fallback:three',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'one_country',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['3.3.3.3'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 3,
|
|
'note': 'from:one__country pool:three fallback:',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'one_country',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['5.5.5.5'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 4,
|
|
'note': 'from:--default--',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'one_country',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['4.4.4.4'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 1,
|
|
'note': 'from:four__country pool:four fallback:',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'four_country',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['5.5.5.5'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 2,
|
|
'note': 'from:--default--',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': 'four_country',
|
|
}],
|
|
'domain': 'unit.tests',
|
|
'filters': filters,
|
|
'regions': {
|
|
'one__country': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:1 fallback:two',
|
|
'country': ['CA'],
|
|
'us_state': ['OR'],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'four__country': {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:2',
|
|
'country': ['CA'],
|
|
'us_state': ['OR'],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
catchall_pool_name: {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:3',
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'tier': 3,
|
|
'ttl': 42,
|
|
}
|
|
data = provider._data_for_dynamic('A', ns1_record)
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'dynamic': {
|
|
'pools': {
|
|
'four': {
|
|
'fallback': None,
|
|
'values': [{'value': '4.4.4.4', 'weight': 1}]
|
|
},
|
|
'one': {
|
|
'fallback': 'two',
|
|
'values': [{'value': '1.1.1.1', 'weight': 1}]
|
|
},
|
|
'three': {
|
|
'fallback': None,
|
|
'values': [{'value': '3.3.3.3', 'weight': 1}]
|
|
},
|
|
'two': {
|
|
'fallback': 'three',
|
|
'values': [{'value': '2.2.2.2', 'weight': 1}]
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'rules': [{
|
|
'_order': '1',
|
|
'geos': ['NA-CA', 'NA-US-OR'],
|
|
'pool': 'one'
|
|
}, {
|
|
'_order': '2',
|
|
'geos': ['NA-CA', 'NA-US-OR'],
|
|
'pool': 'four'
|
|
}, {
|
|
'_order': '3', 'pool': 'iad'}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
'ttl': 42,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'values': ['5.5.5.5']
|
|
}, data)
|
|
|
|
def test_data_for_dynamic_CNAME(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
# Test out a small setup that just covers default value validation
|
|
# Everything else is same as dynamic A whose tests will cover all
|
|
# other options and test cases
|
|
# Not testing for geo/region specific cases
|
|
filters = provider._get_updated_filter_chain(False, False)
|
|
catchall_pool_name = 'iad__catchall'
|
|
ns1_record = {
|
|
'answers': [{
|
|
'answer': ['iad.unit.tests.'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 1,
|
|
'weight': 12,
|
|
'note': 'from:{}'.format(catchall_pool_name),
|
|
},
|
|
'region': catchall_pool_name,
|
|
}, {
|
|
'answer': ['value.unit.tests.'],
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'priority': 2,
|
|
'note': 'from:--default--',
|
|
},
|
|
'region': catchall_pool_name,
|
|
}],
|
|
'domain': 'foo.unit.tests',
|
|
'filters': filters,
|
|
'regions': {
|
|
catchall_pool_name: {
|
|
'meta': {
|
|
'note': 'rule-order:1',
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'tier': 3,
|
|
'ttl': 43,
|
|
'type': 'CNAME',
|
|
}
|
|
data = provider._data_for_CNAME('CNAME', ns1_record)
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'dynamic': {
|
|
'pools': {
|
|
'iad': {
|
|
'fallback': None,
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'value': 'iad.unit.tests.',
|
|
'weight': 12,
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'rules': [{
|
|
'_order': '1',
|
|
'pool': 'iad',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
'ttl': 43,
|
|
'type': 'CNAME',
|
|
'value': 'value.unit.tests.',
|
|
}, data)
|
|
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.records.Records.retrieve')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.zones.Zones.retrieve')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
|
def test_extra_changes(self, monitors_for_mock, zones_retrieve_mock,
|
|
records_retrieve_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
desired = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
|
|
def reset():
|
|
monitors_for_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
provider._client.reset_caches()
|
|
records_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
zones_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
|
|
# Empty zone and no changes
|
|
reset()
|
|
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [])
|
|
self.assertFalse(extra)
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Non-existent zone. No changes
|
|
reset()
|
|
zones_retrieve_mock.side_effect = \
|
|
ResourceException('server error: zone not found')
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [])
|
|
self.assertFalse(extra)
|
|
|
|
# Unexpected exception message
|
|
reset()
|
|
zones_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ResourceException('boom')
|
|
with self.assertRaises(ResourceException) as ctx:
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [])
|
|
self.assertEquals(zones_retrieve_mock.side_effect, ctx.exception)
|
|
|
|
# Simple record, ignored, filter update lookups ignored
|
|
reset()
|
|
zones_retrieve_mock.side_effect = \
|
|
ResourceException('server error: zone not found')
|
|
|
|
simple = Record.new(desired, '', {
|
|
'ttl': 32,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
})
|
|
desired.add_record(simple)
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [])
|
|
self.assertFalse(extra)
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Dynamic record, inspectable
|
|
dynamic = Record.new(desired, 'dyn', {
|
|
'dynamic': {
|
|
'pools': {
|
|
'iad': {
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'rules': [{
|
|
'pool': 'iad',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
'octodns': {
|
|
'healthcheck': {
|
|
'host': 'send.me',
|
|
'path': '/_ping',
|
|
'port': 80,
|
|
'protocol': 'HTTP',
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'ttl': 32,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
})
|
|
desired.add_record(dynamic)
|
|
|
|
# untouched, but everything in sync so no change needed
|
|
reset()
|
|
# Generate what we expect to have
|
|
gend = provider._monitor_gen(dynamic, '1.2.3.4')
|
|
gend.update({
|
|
'id': 'mid', # need to add an id
|
|
'notify_list': 'xyz', # need to add a notify list (for now)
|
|
})
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'1.2.3.4': gend,
|
|
}]
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [])
|
|
self.assertFalse(extra)
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(dynamic)])
|
|
|
|
update = Update(dynamic, dynamic)
|
|
|
|
# If we don't have a notify list we're broken and we'll expect to see
|
|
# an Update
|
|
reset()
|
|
del gend['notify_list']
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'1.2.3.4': gend,
|
|
}]
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [])
|
|
self.assertEquals(1, len(extra))
|
|
extra = list(extra)[0]
|
|
self.assertIsInstance(extra, Update)
|
|
self.assertEquals(dynamic, extra.new)
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(dynamic)])
|
|
|
|
# Add notify_list back and change the healthcheck protocol, we'll still
|
|
# expect to see an update
|
|
reset()
|
|
gend['notify_list'] = 'xyz'
|
|
dynamic._octodns['healthcheck']['protocol'] = 'HTTPS'
|
|
del gend['notify_list']
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'1.2.3.4': gend,
|
|
}]
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [])
|
|
self.assertEquals(1, len(extra))
|
|
extra = list(extra)[0]
|
|
self.assertIsInstance(extra, Update)
|
|
self.assertEquals(dynamic, extra.new)
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(dynamic)])
|
|
|
|
# If it's in the changed list, it'll be ignored
|
|
reset()
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [update])
|
|
self.assertFalse(extra)
|
|
monitors_for_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Test changes in filters
|
|
|
|
# No change in filters
|
|
reset()
|
|
ns1_zone = {
|
|
'records': [{
|
|
"domain": "dyn.unit.tests",
|
|
"zone": "unit.tests",
|
|
"type": "A",
|
|
"tier": 3,
|
|
"filters": Ns1Provider._BASIC_FILTER_CHAIN(provider, True)
|
|
}],
|
|
}
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{}]
|
|
zones_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [ns1_zone]
|
|
records_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ns1_zone['records']
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [])
|
|
self.assertFalse(extra)
|
|
|
|
# filters need an update
|
|
reset()
|
|
ns1_zone = {
|
|
'records': [{
|
|
"domain": "dyn.unit.tests",
|
|
"zone": "unit.tests",
|
|
"type": "A",
|
|
"tier": 3,
|
|
"filters": Ns1Provider._BASIC_FILTER_CHAIN(provider, False)
|
|
}],
|
|
}
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{}]
|
|
zones_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [ns1_zone]
|
|
records_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ns1_zone['records']
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [])
|
|
self.assertTrue(extra)
|
|
|
|
# Mixed disabled in filters. Raise Ns1Exception
|
|
reset()
|
|
ns1_zone = {
|
|
'records': [{
|
|
"domain": "dyn.unit.tests",
|
|
"zone": "unit.tests",
|
|
"type": "A",
|
|
"tier": 3,
|
|
"filters": Ns1Provider._BASIC_FILTER_CHAIN(provider, True)
|
|
}],
|
|
}
|
|
del ns1_zone['records'][0]['filters'][0]['disabled']
|
|
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{}]
|
|
zones_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [ns1_zone]
|
|
records_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ns1_zone['records']
|
|
with self.assertRaises(Ns1Exception) as ctx:
|
|
extra = provider._extra_changes(desired, [])
|
|
self.assertTrue('Mixed disabled flag in filters' in
|
|
text_type(ctx.exception))
|
|
|
|
DESIRED = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
|
|
|
SIMPLE = Record.new(DESIRED, 'sim', {
|
|
'ttl': 33,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
# Dynamic record, inspectable
|
|
DYNAMIC = Record.new(DESIRED, 'dyn', {
|
|
'dynamic': {
|
|
'pools': {
|
|
'iad': {
|
|
'values': [{
|
|
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'rules': [{
|
|
'pool': 'iad',
|
|
}],
|
|
},
|
|
'octodns': {
|
|
'healthcheck': {
|
|
'host': 'send.me',
|
|
'path': '/_ping',
|
|
'port': 80,
|
|
'protocol': 'HTTP',
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
'ttl': 32,
|
|
'type': 'A',
|
|
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
|
'meta': {},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
def test_has_dynamic(self):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
simple_update = Update(self.SIMPLE, self.SIMPLE)
|
|
dynamic_update = Update(self.DYNAMIC, self.DYNAMIC)
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(provider._has_dynamic([simple_update]))
|
|
self.assertTrue(provider._has_dynamic([dynamic_update]))
|
|
self.assertTrue(provider._has_dynamic([simple_update, dynamic_update]))
|
|
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Client.zones_retrieve')
|
|
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._apply_Update')
|
|
def test_apply_monitor_regions(self, apply_update_mock,
|
|
zones_retrieve_mock):
|
|
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
|
|
|
simple_update = Update(self.SIMPLE, self.SIMPLE)
|
|
simple_plan = Plan(self.DESIRED, self.DESIRED, [simple_update], True)
|
|
dynamic_update = Update(self.DYNAMIC, self.DYNAMIC)
|
|
dynamic_update = Update(self.DYNAMIC, self.DYNAMIC)
|
|
dynamic_plan = Plan(self.DESIRED, self.DESIRED, [dynamic_update],
|
|
True)
|
|
both_plan = Plan(self.DESIRED, self.DESIRED, [simple_update,
|
|
dynamic_update], True)
|
|
|
|
# always return foo, we aren't testing this part here
|
|
zones_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
'foo',
|
|
'foo',
|
|
'foo',
|
|
'foo',
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
# Doesn't blow up, and calls apply once
|
|
apply_update_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
provider._apply(simple_plan)
|
|
apply_update_mock.assert_has_calls([call('foo', simple_update)])
|
|
|
|
# Blows up and apply not called
|
|
apply_update_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
with self.assertRaises(Ns1Exception) as ctx:
|
|
provider._apply(dynamic_plan)
|
|
self.assertTrue('monitor_regions not set' in text_type(ctx.exception))
|
|
apply_update_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Blows up and apply not called even though there's a simple
|
|
apply_update_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
with self.assertRaises(Ns1Exception) as ctx:
|
|
provider._apply(both_plan)
|
|
self.assertTrue('monitor_regions not set' in text_type(ctx.exception))
|
|
apply_update_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# with monitor_regions set
|
|
provider.monitor_regions = ['lga']
|
|
|
|
apply_update_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
provider._apply(both_plan)
|
|
apply_update_mock.assert_has_calls([
|
|
call('foo', dynamic_update),
|
|
call('foo', simple_update),
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestNs1Client(TestCase):
|
|
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.zones.Zones.retrieve')
|
|
def test_retry_behavior(self, zone_retrieve_mock):
|
|
client = Ns1Client('dummy-key')
|
|
|
|
# No retry required, just calls and is returned
|
|
client.reset_caches()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ['foo']
|
|
self.assertEquals('foo', client.zones_retrieve('unit.tests'))
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests')])
|
|
|
|
# One retry required
|
|
client.reset_caches()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
RateLimitException('boo', period=0),
|
|
'foo'
|
|
]
|
|
self.assertEquals('foo', client.zones_retrieve('unit.tests'))
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests')])
|
|
|
|
# Two retries required
|
|
client.reset_caches()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
RateLimitException('boo', period=0),
|
|
'foo'
|
|
]
|
|
self.assertEquals('foo', client.zones_retrieve('unit.tests'))
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests')])
|
|
|
|
# Exhaust our retries
|
|
client.reset_caches()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = [
|
|
RateLimitException('first', period=0),
|
|
RateLimitException('boo', period=0),
|
|
RateLimitException('boo', period=0),
|
|
RateLimitException('last', period=0),
|
|
]
|
|
with self.assertRaises(RateLimitException) as ctx:
|
|
client.zones_retrieve('unit.tests')
|
|
self.assertEquals('last', text_type(ctx.exception))
|
|
|
|
def test_client_config(self):
|
|
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
|
|
Ns1Client()
|
|
|
|
client = Ns1Client('dummy-key')
|
|
self.assertEquals(
|
|
client._client.config.get('keys'),
|
|
{'default': {'key': u'dummy-key', 'desc': 'imported API key'}})
|
|
self.assertEquals(client._client.config.get('follow_pagination'), True)
|
|
self.assertEquals(
|
|
client._client.config.get('rate_limit_strategy'), None)
|
|
self.assertEquals(client._client.config.get('parallelism'), None)
|
|
|
|
client = Ns1Client('dummy-key', parallelism=11)
|
|
self.assertEquals(
|
|
client._client.config.get('rate_limit_strategy'), 'concurrent')
|
|
self.assertEquals(client._client.config.get('parallelism'), 11)
|
|
|
|
client = Ns1Client('dummy-key', client_config={
|
|
'endpoint': 'my.endpoint.com', 'follow_pagination': False})
|
|
self.assertEquals(
|
|
client._client.config.get('endpoint'), 'my.endpoint.com')
|
|
self.assertEquals(
|
|
client._client.config.get('follow_pagination'), False)
|
|
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.data.Source.list')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.data.Source.create')
|
|
def test_datasource_id(self, datasource_create_mock, datasource_list_mock):
|
|
client = Ns1Client('dummy-key')
|
|
|
|
# First invocation with an empty list create
|
|
datasource_list_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
datasource_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
datasource_list_mock.side_effect = [[]]
|
|
datasource_create_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'id': 'foo',
|
|
}]
|
|
self.assertEquals('foo', client.datasource_id)
|
|
name = 'octoDNS NS1 Data Source'
|
|
source_type = 'nsone_monitoring'
|
|
datasource_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call(name=name,
|
|
sourcetype=source_type)])
|
|
datasource_list_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
|
|
# 2nd invocation is cached
|
|
datasource_list_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
datasource_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
self.assertEquals('foo', client.datasource_id)
|
|
datasource_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
datasource_list_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Reset the client's cache
|
|
client._datasource_id = None
|
|
|
|
# First invocation with a match in the list finds it and doesn't call
|
|
# create
|
|
datasource_list_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
datasource_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
datasource_list_mock.side_effect = [[{
|
|
'id': 'other',
|
|
'name': 'not a match',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'id': 'bar',
|
|
'name': name,
|
|
}]]
|
|
self.assertEquals('bar', client.datasource_id)
|
|
datasource_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
datasource_list_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.data.Feed.delete')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.data.Feed.create')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.data.Feed.list')
|
|
def test_feeds_for_monitors(self, datafeed_list_mock,
|
|
datafeed_create_mock,
|
|
datafeed_delete_mock):
|
|
client = Ns1Client('dummy-key')
|
|
|
|
# pre-cache datasource_id
|
|
client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
|
|
|
# Populate the cache and check the results
|
|
datafeed_list_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
datafeed_list_mock.side_effect = [[{
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'jobid': 'the-job',
|
|
},
|
|
'id': 'the-feed',
|
|
}, {
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'jobid': 'the-other-job',
|
|
},
|
|
'id': 'the-other-feed',
|
|
}]]
|
|
expected = {
|
|
'the-job': 'the-feed',
|
|
'the-other-job': 'the-other-feed',
|
|
}
|
|
self.assertEquals(expected, client.feeds_for_monitors)
|
|
datafeed_list_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
|
|
# 2nd call uses cache
|
|
datafeed_list_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
self.assertEquals(expected, client.feeds_for_monitors)
|
|
datafeed_list_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# create a feed and make sure it's in the cache/map
|
|
datafeed_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
datafeed_create_mock.side_effect = [{
|
|
'id': 'new-feed',
|
|
}]
|
|
client.datafeed_create(client.datasource_id, 'new-name', {
|
|
'jobid': 'new-job',
|
|
})
|
|
datafeed_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call('foo', 'new-name', {
|
|
'jobid': 'new-job',
|
|
})])
|
|
new_expected = expected.copy()
|
|
new_expected['new-job'] = 'new-feed'
|
|
self.assertEquals(new_expected, client.feeds_for_monitors)
|
|
datafeed_create_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
|
|
# Delete a feed and make sure it's out of the cache/map
|
|
datafeed_delete_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
client.datafeed_delete(client.datasource_id, 'new-feed')
|
|
self.assertEquals(expected, client.feeds_for_monitors)
|
|
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.monitoring.Monitors.delete')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.monitoring.Monitors.update')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.monitoring.Monitors.create')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.monitoring.Monitors.list')
|
|
def test_monitors(self, monitors_list_mock, monitors_create_mock,
|
|
monitors_update_mock, monitors_delete_mock):
|
|
client = Ns1Client('dummy-key')
|
|
|
|
one = {
|
|
'id': 'one',
|
|
'key': 'value',
|
|
}
|
|
two = {
|
|
'id': 'two',
|
|
'key': 'other-value',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# Populate the cache and check the results
|
|
monitors_list_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_list_mock.side_effect = [[one, two]]
|
|
expected = {
|
|
'one': one,
|
|
'two': two,
|
|
}
|
|
self.assertEquals(expected, client.monitors)
|
|
monitors_list_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
|
|
# 2nd round pulls it from cache
|
|
monitors_list_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
self.assertEquals(expected, client.monitors)
|
|
monitors_list_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Create a monitor, make sure it's in the list
|
|
monitors_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitor = {
|
|
'id': 'new-id',
|
|
'key': 'new-value',
|
|
}
|
|
monitors_create_mock.side_effect = [monitor]
|
|
self.assertEquals(monitor, client.monitors_create(param='eter'))
|
|
monitors_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call({}, param='eter')])
|
|
new_expected = expected.copy()
|
|
new_expected['new-id'] = monitor
|
|
self.assertEquals(new_expected, client.monitors)
|
|
|
|
# Update a monitor, make sure it's updated in the cache
|
|
monitors_update_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitor = {
|
|
'id': 'new-id',
|
|
'key': 'changed-value',
|
|
}
|
|
monitors_update_mock.side_effect = [monitor]
|
|
self.assertEquals(monitor, client.monitors_update('new-id',
|
|
key='changed-value'))
|
|
monitors_update_mock \
|
|
.assert_has_calls([call('new-id', {}, key='changed-value')])
|
|
new_expected['new-id'] = monitor
|
|
self.assertEquals(new_expected, client.monitors)
|
|
|
|
# Delete a monitor, make sure it's out of the list
|
|
monitors_delete_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
monitors_delete_mock.side_effect = ['deleted']
|
|
self.assertEquals('deleted', client.monitors_delete('new-id'))
|
|
monitors_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('new-id')])
|
|
self.assertEquals(expected, client.monitors)
|
|
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.monitoring.NotifyLists.delete')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.monitoring.NotifyLists.create')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.monitoring.NotifyLists.list')
|
|
def test_notifylists(self, notifylists_list_mock, notifylists_create_mock,
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock):
|
|
client = Ns1Client('dummy-key')
|
|
|
|
def reset():
|
|
notifylists_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
notifylists_list_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
|
|
reset()
|
|
notifylists_list_mock.side_effect = [{}]
|
|
expected = {
|
|
'id': 'nl-id',
|
|
'name': 'bar',
|
|
}
|
|
notifylists_create_mock.side_effect = [expected]
|
|
notify_list = [{
|
|
'config': {
|
|
'sourceid': 'foo',
|
|
},
|
|
'type': 'datafeed',
|
|
}]
|
|
got = client.notifylists_create(name='some name',
|
|
notify_list=notify_list)
|
|
self.assertEquals(expected, got)
|
|
notifylists_list_mock.assert_called_once()
|
|
notifylists_create_mock.assert_has_calls([
|
|
call({'name': 'some name', 'notify_list': notify_list})
|
|
])
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
reset()
|
|
client.notifylists_delete('nlid')
|
|
notifylists_list_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
notifylists_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('nlid')])
|
|
|
|
# Delete again, this time with a cache item that needs cleaned out and
|
|
# another that needs to be ignored
|
|
reset()
|
|
client._notifylists_cache = {
|
|
'another': {
|
|
'id': 'notid',
|
|
'name': 'another',
|
|
},
|
|
# This one comes 2nd on purpose
|
|
'the-one': {
|
|
'id': 'nlid',
|
|
'name': 'the-one',
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
client.notifylists_delete('nlid')
|
|
notifylists_list_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
notifylists_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('nlid')])
|
|
# Only another left
|
|
self.assertEquals(['another'], list(client._notifylists_cache.keys()))
|
|
|
|
reset()
|
|
expected = ['one', 'two', 'three']
|
|
notifylists_list_mock.side_effect = [expected]
|
|
nls = client.notifylists_list()
|
|
self.assertEquals(expected, nls)
|
|
notifylists_list_mock.assert_has_calls([call()])
|
|
notifylists_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.records.Records.delete')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.records.Records.update')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.records.Records.create')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.records.Records.retrieve')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.zones.Zones.create')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.zones.Zones.delete')
|
|
@patch('ns1.rest.zones.Zones.retrieve')
|
|
def test_client_caching(self, zone_retrieve_mock, zone_delete_mock,
|
|
zone_create_mock, record_retrieve_mock,
|
|
record_create_mock, record_update_mock,
|
|
record_delete_mock):
|
|
client = Ns1Client('dummy-key')
|
|
|
|
def reset():
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
zone_delete_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
zone_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
record_create_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
record_update_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
record_delete_mock.reset_mock()
|
|
# Testing caches so we don't reset those
|
|
|
|
# Initial zone get fetches and caches
|
|
reset()
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ['foo']
|
|
self.assertEquals('foo', client.zones_retrieve('unit.tests'))
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests')])
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'unit.tests': 'foo',
|
|
}, client._zones_cache)
|
|
|
|
# Subsequent zone get does not fetch and returns from cache
|
|
reset()
|
|
self.assertEquals('foo', client.zones_retrieve('unit.tests'))
|
|
zone_retrieve_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Zone create stores in cache
|
|
reset()
|
|
zone_create_mock.side_effect = ['bar']
|
|
self.assertEquals('bar', client.zones_create('sub.unit.tests'))
|
|
zone_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call('sub.unit.tests')])
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'sub.unit.tests': 'bar',
|
|
'unit.tests': 'foo',
|
|
}, client._zones_cache)
|
|
|
|
# Initial record get fetches and caches
|
|
reset()
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.side_effect = ['baz']
|
|
self.assertEquals('baz', client.records_retrieve('unit.tests',
|
|
'a.unit.tests', 'A'))
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests',
|
|
'a.unit.tests', 'A')])
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'unit.tests': {
|
|
'a.unit.tests': {
|
|
'A': 'baz'
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}, client._records_cache)
|
|
|
|
# Subsequent record get does not fetch and returns from cache
|
|
reset()
|
|
self.assertEquals('baz', client.records_retrieve('unit.tests',
|
|
'a.unit.tests', 'A'))
|
|
record_retrieve_mock.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
# Record create stores in cache
|
|
reset()
|
|
record_create_mock.side_effect = ['boo']
|
|
self.assertEquals('boo', client.records_create('unit.tests',
|
|
'aaaa.unit.tests',
|
|
'AAAA', key='val'))
|
|
record_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests',
|
|
'aaaa.unit.tests', 'AAAA',
|
|
key='val')])
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'unit.tests': {
|
|
'a.unit.tests': {
|
|
'A': 'baz'
|
|
},
|
|
'aaaa.unit.tests': {
|
|
'AAAA': 'boo'
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}, client._records_cache)
|
|
|
|
# Record delete removes from cache and removes zone
|
|
reset()
|
|
record_delete_mock.side_effect = [{}]
|
|
self.assertEquals({}, client.records_delete('unit.tests',
|
|
'aaaa.unit.tests',
|
|
'AAAA'))
|
|
record_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests',
|
|
'aaaa.unit.tests', 'AAAA')])
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'unit.tests': {
|
|
'a.unit.tests': {
|
|
'A': 'baz'
|
|
},
|
|
'aaaa.unit.tests': {},
|
|
}
|
|
}, client._records_cache)
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'sub.unit.tests': 'bar',
|
|
}, client._zones_cache)
|
|
|
|
# Delete the other record, no zone this time, record should still go
|
|
# away
|
|
reset()
|
|
record_delete_mock.side_effect = [{}]
|
|
self.assertEquals({}, client.records_delete('unit.tests',
|
|
'a.unit.tests', 'A'))
|
|
record_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('unit.tests', 'a.unit.tests',
|
|
'A')])
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'unit.tests': {
|
|
'a.unit.tests': {},
|
|
'aaaa.unit.tests': {},
|
|
}
|
|
}, client._records_cache)
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'sub.unit.tests': 'bar',
|
|
}, client._zones_cache)
|
|
|
|
# Record update removes zone and caches result
|
|
record_update_mock.side_effect = ['done']
|
|
self.assertEquals('done', client.records_update('sub.unit.tests',
|
|
'aaaa.sub.unit.tests',
|
|
'AAAA', key='val'))
|
|
record_update_mock.assert_has_calls([call('sub.unit.tests',
|
|
'aaaa.sub.unit.tests',
|
|
'AAAA', key='val')])
|
|
self.assertEquals({
|
|
'unit.tests': {
|
|
'a.unit.tests': {},
|
|
'aaaa.unit.tests': {},
|
|
},
|
|
'sub.unit.tests': {
|
|
'aaaa.sub.unit.tests': {
|
|
'AAAA': 'done',
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}, client._records_cache)
|
|
self.assertEquals({}, client._zones_cache)
|