mirror of
https://github.com/github/octodns.git
synced 2024-05-11 05:55:00 +00:00
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/github/octodns into ultradns_support
This commit is contained in:
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ test:
|
||||
| Key | Description | Default |
|
||||
|--|--|--|
|
||||
| measure_latency | Show latency in AWS console | true |
|
||||
| request_interval | Healthcheck interval [10\|30] seconds | 10 |
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -123,4 +124,5 @@ test:
|
||||
route53:
|
||||
healthcheck:
|
||||
measure_latency: false
|
||||
request_interval: 30
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ test:
|
||||
| Key | Description | Default |
|
||||
|--|--|--|
|
||||
| measure_latency | Show latency in AWS console | true |
|
||||
| request_interval | Healthcheck interval [10\|30] seconds | 10 |
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -98,4 +99,5 @@ test:
|
||||
route53:
|
||||
healthcheck:
|
||||
measure_latency: false
|
||||
request_interval: 30
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
+15
-4
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ from __future__ import absolute_import, division, print_function, \
|
||||
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
|
||||
from importlib import import_module
|
||||
from os import environ
|
||||
from six import text_type
|
||||
import logging
|
||||
|
||||
from .provider.base import BaseProvider
|
||||
@@ -221,13 +222,21 @@ class Manager(object):
|
||||
self.log.debug('configured_sub_zones: subs=%s', sub_zone_names)
|
||||
return set(sub_zone_names)
|
||||
|
||||
def _populate_and_plan(self, zone_name, sources, targets):
|
||||
def _populate_and_plan(self, zone_name, sources, targets, lenient=False):
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.debug('sync: populating, zone=%s', zone_name)
|
||||
self.log.debug('sync: populating, zone=%s, lenient=%s',
|
||||
zone_name, lenient)
|
||||
zone = Zone(zone_name,
|
||||
sub_zones=self.configured_sub_zones(zone_name))
|
||||
for source in sources:
|
||||
source.populate(zone)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
source.populate(zone, lenient=lenient)
|
||||
except TypeError as e:
|
||||
if "keyword argument 'lenient'" not in text_type(e):
|
||||
raise
|
||||
self.log.warn(': provider %s does not accept lenient param',
|
||||
source.__class__.__name__)
|
||||
source.populate(zone)
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.debug('sync: planning, zone=%s', zone_name)
|
||||
plans = []
|
||||
@@ -259,6 +268,7 @@ class Manager(object):
|
||||
futures = []
|
||||
for zone_name, config in zones:
|
||||
self.log.info('sync: zone=%s', zone_name)
|
||||
lenient = config.get('lenient', False)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
sources = config['sources']
|
||||
except KeyError:
|
||||
@@ -308,7 +318,8 @@ class Manager(object):
|
||||
.format(zone_name, target))
|
||||
|
||||
futures.append(self._executor.submit(self._populate_and_plan,
|
||||
zone_name, sources, targets))
|
||||
zone_name, sources,
|
||||
targets, lenient=lenient))
|
||||
|
||||
# Wait on all results and unpack/flatten them in to a list of target &
|
||||
# plan pairs.
|
||||
|
||||
+58
-39
@@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ class Ns1Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
'NS', 'PTR', 'SPF', 'SRV', 'TXT'))
|
||||
|
||||
ZONE_NOT_FOUND_MESSAGE = 'server error: zone not found'
|
||||
CATCHALL_PREFIX = 'catchall__'
|
||||
|
||||
def _update_filter(self, filter, with_disabled):
|
||||
if with_disabled:
|
||||
@@ -455,6 +454,16 @@ class Ns1Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
data['geo'] = geo
|
||||
return data
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_dynamic_pool_name(self, pool_name):
|
||||
if pool_name.startswith('catchall__'):
|
||||
# Special case for the old-style catchall prefix
|
||||
return pool_name[10:]
|
||||
try:
|
||||
pool_name, _ = pool_name.rsplit('__', 1)
|
||||
except ValueError:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
return pool_name
|
||||
|
||||
def _data_for_dynamic_A(self, _type, record):
|
||||
# First make sure we have the expected filters config
|
||||
if not self._valid_filter_config(record['filters'], record['domain']):
|
||||
@@ -472,9 +481,8 @@ class Ns1Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
for answer in record['answers']:
|
||||
# region (group name in the UI) is the pool name
|
||||
pool_name = answer['region']
|
||||
# Get the actual pool name from the constructed pool name in case
|
||||
# of the catchall
|
||||
pool_name = pool_name.replace(self.CATCHALL_PREFIX, '')
|
||||
# Get the actual pool name by removing the type
|
||||
pool_name = self._parse_dynamic_pool_name(pool_name)
|
||||
pool = pools[pool_name]
|
||||
|
||||
meta = answer['meta']
|
||||
@@ -501,15 +509,24 @@ class Ns1Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
# tied to pools on the NS1 side, e.g. we can only have 1 rule per pool,
|
||||
# that may eventually run into problems, but I don't have any use-cases
|
||||
# examples currently where it would
|
||||
rules = []
|
||||
rules = {}
|
||||
for pool_name, region in sorted(record['regions'].items()):
|
||||
# Rules that refer to the catchall pool would have the
|
||||
# CATCHALL_PREFIX in the pool name. Strip the prefix to get back
|
||||
# the pool name as in the config
|
||||
pool_name = pool_name.replace(self.CATCHALL_PREFIX, '')
|
||||
# Get the actual pool name by removing the type
|
||||
pool_name = self._parse_dynamic_pool_name(pool_name)
|
||||
|
||||
meta = region['meta']
|
||||
notes = self._parse_notes(meta.get('note', ''))
|
||||
|
||||
rule_order = notes['rule-order']
|
||||
try:
|
||||
rule = rules[rule_order]
|
||||
except KeyError:
|
||||
rule = {
|
||||
'pool': pool_name,
|
||||
'_order': rule_order,
|
||||
}
|
||||
rules[rule_order] = rule
|
||||
|
||||
# The group notes field in the UI is a `note` on the region here,
|
||||
# that's where we can find our pool's fallback.
|
||||
if 'fallback' in notes:
|
||||
@@ -560,17 +577,15 @@ class Ns1Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
for state in meta.get('us_state', []):
|
||||
geos.add('NA-US-{}'.format(state))
|
||||
|
||||
rule = {
|
||||
'pool': pool_name,
|
||||
'_order': notes['rule-order'],
|
||||
}
|
||||
if geos:
|
||||
rule['geos'] = sorted(geos)
|
||||
rules.append(rule)
|
||||
# There are geos, combine them with any existing geos for this
|
||||
# pool and recorded the sorted unique set of them
|
||||
rule['geos'] = sorted(set(rule.get('geos', [])) | geos)
|
||||
|
||||
# Order and convert to a list
|
||||
default = sorted(default)
|
||||
# Order
|
||||
# Convert to list and order
|
||||
rules = list(rules.values())
|
||||
rules.sort(key=lambda r: (r['_order'], r['pool']))
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
@@ -1050,29 +1065,34 @@ class Ns1Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
meta = {
|
||||
'note': self._encode_notes(notes),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if georegion:
|
||||
meta['georegion'] = sorted(georegion)
|
||||
if country:
|
||||
meta['country'] = sorted(country)
|
||||
if us_state:
|
||||
meta['us_state'] = sorted(us_state)
|
||||
georegion_meta = dict(meta)
|
||||
georegion_meta['georegion'] = sorted(georegion)
|
||||
regions['{}__georegion'.format(pool_name)] = {
|
||||
'meta': georegion_meta,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if country or us_state:
|
||||
# If there's country and/or states its a country pool,
|
||||
# countries and states can coexist as they're handled by the
|
||||
# same step in the filterchain (countries and georegions
|
||||
# cannot as they're seperate stages and run the risk of
|
||||
# eliminating all options)
|
||||
country_state_meta = dict(meta)
|
||||
if country:
|
||||
country_state_meta['country'] = sorted(country)
|
||||
if us_state:
|
||||
country_state_meta['us_state'] = sorted(us_state)
|
||||
regions['{}__country'.format(pool_name)] = {
|
||||
'meta': country_state_meta,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if not georegion and not country and not us_state:
|
||||
# This is the catchall pool. Modify the pool name in the record
|
||||
# being pushed
|
||||
# NS1 regions are indexed by pool names. Any reuse of pool
|
||||
# names in the rules will result in overwriting of the pool.
|
||||
# Reuse of pools is in general disallowed but for the case of
|
||||
# the catchall pool - to allow legitimate usecases.
|
||||
# The pool name renaming is done to accommodate for such a
|
||||
# reuse.
|
||||
# (We expect only one catchall per record. Any associated
|
||||
# validation is expected to covered under record validation)
|
||||
pool_name = '{}{}'.format(self.CATCHALL_PREFIX, pool_name)
|
||||
|
||||
regions[pool_name] = {
|
||||
'meta': meta,
|
||||
}
|
||||
# If there's no targeting it's a catchall
|
||||
regions['{}__catchall'.format(pool_name)] = {
|
||||
'meta': meta,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
existing_monitors = self._monitors_for(record)
|
||||
active_monitors = set()
|
||||
@@ -1102,15 +1122,14 @@ class Ns1Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
# Build our list of answers
|
||||
# The regions dictionary built above already has the required pool
|
||||
# names. Iterate over them and add answers.
|
||||
# In the case of the catchall, original pool name can be obtained
|
||||
# by stripping the CATCHALL_PREFIX from the pool name
|
||||
answers = []
|
||||
for pool_name in sorted(regions.keys()):
|
||||
priority = 1
|
||||
|
||||
# Dynamic/health checked
|
||||
pool_label = pool_name
|
||||
pool_name = pool_name.replace(self.CATCHALL_PREFIX, '')
|
||||
# Remove the pool type from the end of the name
|
||||
pool_name = self._parse_dynamic_pool_name(pool_name)
|
||||
self._add_answers_for_pool(answers, default_answers, pool_name,
|
||||
pool_label, pool_answers, pools,
|
||||
priority)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -512,6 +512,10 @@ class _Route53GeoRecord(_Route53Record):
|
||||
self.values)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Route53ProviderException(Exception):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _mod_keyer(mod):
|
||||
rrset = mod['ResourceRecordSet']
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1031,8 +1035,20 @@ class Route53Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
.get('healthcheck', {}) \
|
||||
.get('measure_latency', True)
|
||||
|
||||
def _healthcheck_request_interval(self, record):
|
||||
interval = record._octodns.get('route53', {}) \
|
||||
.get('healthcheck', {}) \
|
||||
.get('request_interval', 10)
|
||||
if (interval in [10, 30]):
|
||||
return interval
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise Route53ProviderException(
|
||||
'route53.healthcheck.request_interval '
|
||||
'parameter must be either 10 or 30.')
|
||||
|
||||
def _health_check_equivalent(self, host, path, protocol, port,
|
||||
measure_latency, health_check, value=None):
|
||||
measure_latency, request_interval,
|
||||
health_check, value=None):
|
||||
config = health_check['HealthCheckConfig']
|
||||
|
||||
# So interestingly Route53 normalizes IPAddress which will cause us to
|
||||
@@ -1050,9 +1066,10 @@ class Route53Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
None)
|
||||
resource_path = config.get('ResourcePath', None)
|
||||
return host == fully_qualified_domain_name and \
|
||||
path == resource_path and protocol == config['Type'] \
|
||||
and port == config['Port'] and \
|
||||
path == resource_path and protocol == config['Type'] and \
|
||||
port == config['Port'] and \
|
||||
measure_latency == config['MeasureLatency'] and \
|
||||
request_interval == config['RequestInterval'] and \
|
||||
value == config_ip_address
|
||||
|
||||
def get_health_check_id(self, record, value, create):
|
||||
@@ -1077,6 +1094,7 @@ class Route53Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
healthcheck_protocol = record.healthcheck_protocol
|
||||
healthcheck_port = record.healthcheck_port
|
||||
healthcheck_latency = self._healthcheck_measure_latency(record)
|
||||
healthcheck_interval = self._healthcheck_request_interval(record)
|
||||
|
||||
# we're looking for a healthcheck with the current version & our record
|
||||
# type, we'll ignore anything else
|
||||
@@ -1091,6 +1109,7 @@ class Route53Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
healthcheck_protocol,
|
||||
healthcheck_port,
|
||||
healthcheck_latency,
|
||||
healthcheck_interval,
|
||||
health_check,
|
||||
value=value):
|
||||
# this is the health check we're looking for
|
||||
@@ -1108,7 +1127,7 @@ class Route53Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
'FailureThreshold': 6,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': healthcheck_latency,
|
||||
'Port': healthcheck_port,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': healthcheck_interval,
|
||||
'Type': healthcheck_protocol,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if healthcheck_protocol != 'TCP':
|
||||
@@ -1143,9 +1162,10 @@ class Route53Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
self._health_checks[id] = health_check
|
||||
self.log.info('get_health_check_id: created id=%s, host=%s, '
|
||||
'path=%s, protocol=%s, port=%d, measure_latency=%r, '
|
||||
'value=%s', id, healthcheck_host, healthcheck_path,
|
||||
'request_interval=%d, value=%s',
|
||||
id, healthcheck_host, healthcheck_path,
|
||||
healthcheck_protocol, healthcheck_port,
|
||||
healthcheck_latency, value)
|
||||
healthcheck_latency, healthcheck_interval, value)
|
||||
return id
|
||||
|
||||
def _gc_health_checks(self, record, new):
|
||||
@@ -1238,6 +1258,7 @@ class Route53Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
healthcheck_protocol = record.healthcheck_protocol
|
||||
healthcheck_port = record.healthcheck_port
|
||||
healthcheck_latency = self._healthcheck_measure_latency(record)
|
||||
healthcheck_interval = self._healthcheck_request_interval(record)
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
health_check_id = rrset['HealthCheckId']
|
||||
@@ -1249,6 +1270,7 @@ class Route53Provider(BaseProvider):
|
||||
healthcheck_protocol,
|
||||
healthcheck_port,
|
||||
healthcheck_latency,
|
||||
healthcheck_interval,
|
||||
health_check):
|
||||
# it has the right health check
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ class SrvRecord(_ValuesMixin, Record):
|
||||
def validate(cls, name, fqdn, data):
|
||||
reasons = []
|
||||
if not cls._name_re.match(name):
|
||||
reasons.append('invalid name')
|
||||
reasons.append('invalid name for SRV record')
|
||||
reasons.extend(super(SrvRecord, cls).validate(name, fqdn, data))
|
||||
return reasons
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+4
-4
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
PyYaml==5.3.1
|
||||
azure-common==1.1.25
|
||||
azure-mgmt-dns==3.0.0
|
||||
boto3==1.13.19
|
||||
botocore==1.16.19
|
||||
boto3==1.14.14
|
||||
botocore==1.17.14
|
||||
dnspython==1.16.0
|
||||
docutils==0.16
|
||||
dyn==1.8.1
|
||||
@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@ google-cloud-core==1.3.0
|
||||
google-cloud-dns==0.32.0
|
||||
ipaddress==1.0.23
|
||||
jmespath==0.10.0
|
||||
msrestazure==0.6.3
|
||||
msrestazure==0.6.4
|
||||
natsort==6.2.1
|
||||
ns1-python==0.16.0
|
||||
ovh==0.5.0
|
||||
pycountry-convert==0.7.2
|
||||
pycountry==19.8.18
|
||||
python-dateutil==2.8.1
|
||||
requests==2.23.0
|
||||
requests==2.24.0
|
||||
s3transfer==0.3.3
|
||||
setuptools==44.1.1
|
||||
six==1.15.0
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -278,6 +278,29 @@ class TestManager(TestCase):
|
||||
.validate_configs()
|
||||
self.assertTrue('unknown source' in text_type(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_populate_lenient_fallback(self):
|
||||
with TemporaryDirectory() as tmpdir:
|
||||
environ['YAML_TMP_DIR'] = tmpdir.dirname
|
||||
# Only allow a target that doesn't exist
|
||||
manager = Manager(get_config_filename('simple.yaml'))
|
||||
|
||||
class NoLenient(SimpleProvider):
|
||||
|
||||
def populate(self, zone, source=False):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
# This should be ok, we'll fall back to not passing it
|
||||
manager._populate_and_plan('unit.tests.', [NoLenient()], [])
|
||||
|
||||
class NoZone(SimpleProvider):
|
||||
|
||||
def populate(self, lenient=False):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
# This will blow up, we don't fallback for source
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
|
||||
manager._populate_and_plan('unit.tests.', [NoZone()], [])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMainThreadExecutor(TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -528,52 +528,55 @@ class TestNs1Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
zone = Zone('unit.tests.', [])
|
||||
|
||||
record = Record.new(zone, '', {
|
||||
'dynamic': {
|
||||
'pools': {
|
||||
'lhr': {
|
||||
'fallback': 'iad',
|
||||
'values': [{
|
||||
'value': '3.4.5.6',
|
||||
}],
|
||||
},
|
||||
'iad': {
|
||||
'values': [{
|
||||
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
'value': '2.3.4.5',
|
||||
}],
|
||||
def record(self):
|
||||
# return a new object each time so we can mess with it without causing
|
||||
# problems from test to test
|
||||
return Record.new(self.zone, '', {
|
||||
'dynamic': {
|
||||
'pools': {
|
||||
'lhr': {
|
||||
'fallback': 'iad',
|
||||
'values': [{
|
||||
'value': '3.4.5.6',
|
||||
}],
|
||||
},
|
||||
'iad': {
|
||||
'values': [{
|
||||
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
'value': '2.3.4.5',
|
||||
}],
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
'rules': [{
|
||||
'geos': [
|
||||
'AF',
|
||||
'EU-GB',
|
||||
'NA-US-FL'
|
||||
],
|
||||
'pool': 'lhr',
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
'geos': [
|
||||
'AF-ZW',
|
||||
],
|
||||
'pool': 'iad',
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
'pool': 'iad',
|
||||
}],
|
||||
},
|
||||
'rules': [{
|
||||
'geos': [
|
||||
'AF',
|
||||
'EU-GB',
|
||||
'NA-US-FL'
|
||||
],
|
||||
'pool': 'lhr',
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
'geos': [
|
||||
'AF-ZW',
|
||||
],
|
||||
'pool': 'iad',
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
'pool': 'iad',
|
||||
}],
|
||||
},
|
||||
'octodns': {
|
||||
'healthcheck': {
|
||||
'host': 'send.me',
|
||||
'path': '/_ping',
|
||||
'port': 80,
|
||||
'protocol': 'HTTP',
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
'ttl': 32,
|
||||
'type': 'A',
|
||||
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
||||
'meta': {},
|
||||
})
|
||||
'octodns': {
|
||||
'healthcheck': {
|
||||
'host': 'send.me',
|
||||
'path': '/_ping',
|
||||
'port': 80,
|
||||
'protocol': 'HTTP',
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
'ttl': 32,
|
||||
'type': 'A',
|
||||
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
||||
'meta': {},
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_notes(self):
|
||||
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
||||
@@ -636,7 +639,7 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEquals({
|
||||
'1.2.3.4': monitor_one,
|
||||
'2.3.4.5': monitor_four,
|
||||
}, provider._monitors_for(self.record))
|
||||
}, provider._monitors_for(self.record()))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_uuid(self):
|
||||
# Just a smoke test/for coverage
|
||||
@@ -707,18 +710,19 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
||||
|
||||
value = '3.4.5.6'
|
||||
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(self.record, value)
|
||||
record = self.record()
|
||||
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(record, value)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(value, monitor['config']['host'])
|
||||
self.assertTrue('\\nHost: send.me\\r' in monitor['config']['send'])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(monitor['config']['ssl'])
|
||||
self.assertEquals('host:unit.tests type:A', monitor['notes'])
|
||||
|
||||
self.record._octodns['healthcheck']['protocol'] = 'HTTPS'
|
||||
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(self.record, value)
|
||||
record._octodns['healthcheck']['protocol'] = 'HTTPS'
|
||||
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(record, value)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(monitor['config']['ssl'])
|
||||
|
||||
self.record._octodns['healthcheck']['protocol'] = 'TCP'
|
||||
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(self.record, value)
|
||||
record._octodns['healthcheck']['protocol'] = 'TCP'
|
||||
monitor = provider._monitor_gen(record, value)
|
||||
# No http send done
|
||||
self.assertFalse('send' in monitor['config'])
|
||||
# No http response expected
|
||||
@@ -790,10 +794,11 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
monitor_gen_mock.side_effect = [{'key': 'value'}]
|
||||
monitor_create_mock.side_effect = [('mon-id', 'feed-id')]
|
||||
value = '1.2.3.4'
|
||||
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(self.record, value, None)
|
||||
record = self.record()
|
||||
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(record, value, None)
|
||||
self.assertEquals('mon-id', monitor_id)
|
||||
self.assertEquals('feed-id', feed_id)
|
||||
monitor_gen_mock.assert_has_calls([call(self.record, value)])
|
||||
monitor_gen_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record, value)])
|
||||
monitor_create_mock.assert_has_calls([call({'key': 'value'})])
|
||||
monitors_update_mock.assert_not_called()
|
||||
feed_create_mock.assert_not_called()
|
||||
@@ -809,7 +814,7 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
'name': 'monitor name',
|
||||
}
|
||||
monitor_gen_mock.side_effect = [monitor]
|
||||
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(self.record, value,
|
||||
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(record, value,
|
||||
monitor)
|
||||
self.assertEquals('mon-id', monitor_id)
|
||||
self.assertEquals('feed-id', feed_id)
|
||||
@@ -830,7 +835,7 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
}
|
||||
monitor_gen_mock.side_effect = [monitor]
|
||||
feed_create_mock.side_effect = ['feed-id2']
|
||||
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(self.record, value,
|
||||
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(record, value,
|
||||
monitor)
|
||||
self.assertEquals('mon-id2', monitor_id)
|
||||
self.assertEquals('feed-id2', feed_id)
|
||||
@@ -853,7 +858,7 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
'other': 'thing',
|
||||
}
|
||||
monitor_gen_mock.side_effect = [gened]
|
||||
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(self.record, value,
|
||||
monitor_id, feed_id = provider._monitor_sync(record, value,
|
||||
monitor)
|
||||
self.assertEquals('mon-id', monitor_id)
|
||||
self.assertEquals('feed-id', feed_id)
|
||||
@@ -883,8 +888,9 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
monitors_delete_mock.reset_mock()
|
||||
notifylists_delete_mock.reset_mock()
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{}]
|
||||
provider._monitors_gc(self.record)
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(self.record)])
|
||||
record = self.record()
|
||||
provider._monitors_gc(record)
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
||||
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
||||
monitors_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
||||
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
||||
@@ -900,8 +906,8 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
'notify_list': 'nl-id',
|
||||
}
|
||||
}]
|
||||
provider._monitors_gc(self.record)
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(self.record)])
|
||||
provider._monitors_gc(record)
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
||||
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('foo', 'feed-id')])
|
||||
monitors_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('mon-id')])
|
||||
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('nl-id')])
|
||||
@@ -917,8 +923,8 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
'notify_list': 'nl-id',
|
||||
}
|
||||
}]
|
||||
provider._monitors_gc(self.record, {'mon-id'})
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(self.record)])
|
||||
provider._monitors_gc(record, {'mon-id'})
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
||||
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
||||
monitors_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
||||
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
||||
@@ -939,8 +945,8 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
'notify_list': 'nl-id2',
|
||||
},
|
||||
}]
|
||||
provider._monitors_gc(self.record, {'mon-id'})
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(self.record)])
|
||||
provider._monitors_gc(record, {'mon-id'})
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
||||
datafeed_delete_mock.assert_not_called()
|
||||
monitors_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('mon-id2')])
|
||||
notifylists_delete_mock.assert_has_calls([call('nl-id2')])
|
||||
@@ -972,18 +978,202 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
('mid-3', 'fid-3'),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
rule0 = self.record.data['dynamic']['rules'][0]
|
||||
rule1 = self.record.data['dynamic']['rules'][1]
|
||||
rule0_saved_geos = rule0['geos']
|
||||
rule1_saved_geos = rule1['geos']
|
||||
record = self.record()
|
||||
rule0 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][0]
|
||||
rule1 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][1]
|
||||
rule0['geos'] = ['AF', 'EU']
|
||||
rule1['geos'] = ['NA']
|
||||
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(self.record)
|
||||
ret, monitor_ids = provider._params_for_A(record)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(10, len(ret['answers']))
|
||||
self.assertEquals(ret['filters'],
|
||||
Ns1Provider._FILTER_CHAIN_WITH_REGION(provider,
|
||||
True))
|
||||
rule0['geos'] = rule0_saved_geos
|
||||
rule1['geos'] = rule1_saved_geos
|
||||
self.assertEquals({
|
||||
'iad__catchall': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'note': 'rule-order:2'
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
'iad__georegion': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'georegion': ['US-CENTRAL', 'US-EAST', 'US-WEST'],
|
||||
'note': 'rule-order:1'
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
'lhr__georegion': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'georegion': ['AFRICA', 'EUROPE'],
|
||||
'note': 'fallback:iad rule-order:0'
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}, ret['regions'])
|
||||
self.assertEquals({'mid-1', 'mid-2', 'mid-3'}, monitor_ids)
|
||||
|
||||
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_sync')
|
||||
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
||||
def test_params_for_dynamic_state_only(self, monitors_for_mock,
|
||||
monitor_sync_mock):
|
||||
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
||||
|
||||
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
||||
# elsewhere)
|
||||
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
||||
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {
|
||||
'mon-id': 'feed-id',
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# provider._params_for_A() calls provider._monitors_for() and
|
||||
# provider._monitor_sync(). Mock their return values so that we don't
|
||||
# make NS1 API calls during tests
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.reset_mock()
|
||||
monitor_sync_mock.reset_mock()
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
||||
'3.4.5.6': 'mid-3',
|
||||
}]
|
||||
monitor_sync_mock.side_effect = [
|
||||
('mid-1', 'fid-1'),
|
||||
('mid-2', 'fid-2'),
|
||||
('mid-3', 'fid-3'),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
record = self.record()
|
||||
rule0 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][0]
|
||||
rule1 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][1]
|
||||
rule0['geos'] = ['AF', 'EU']
|
||||
rule1['geos'] = ['NA-US-CA']
|
||||
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(record)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(10, len(ret['answers']))
|
||||
exp = Ns1Provider._FILTER_CHAIN_WITH_REGION_AND_COUNTRY(provider,
|
||||
True)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(ret['filters'], exp)
|
||||
self.assertEquals({
|
||||
'iad__catchall': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'note': 'rule-order:2'
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
'iad__country': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'note': 'rule-order:1',
|
||||
'us_state': ['CA']
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
'lhr__georegion': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'georegion': ['AFRICA', 'EUROPE'],
|
||||
'note': 'fallback:iad rule-order:0'
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}, ret['regions'])
|
||||
|
||||
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_sync')
|
||||
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
||||
def test_params_for_dynamic_contient_and_countries(self,
|
||||
monitors_for_mock,
|
||||
monitor_sync_mock):
|
||||
provider = Ns1Provider('test', 'api-key')
|
||||
|
||||
# pre-fill caches to avoid extranious calls (things we're testing
|
||||
# elsewhere)
|
||||
provider._client._datasource_id = 'foo'
|
||||
provider._client._feeds_for_monitors = {
|
||||
'mon-id': 'feed-id',
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# provider._params_for_A() calls provider._monitors_for() and
|
||||
# provider._monitor_sync(). Mock their return values so that we don't
|
||||
# make NS1 API calls during tests
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.reset_mock()
|
||||
monitor_sync_mock.reset_mock()
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.side_effect = [{
|
||||
'3.4.5.6': 'mid-3',
|
||||
}]
|
||||
monitor_sync_mock.side_effect = [
|
||||
('mid-1', 'fid-1'),
|
||||
('mid-2', 'fid-2'),
|
||||
('mid-3', 'fid-3'),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
record = self.record()
|
||||
rule0 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][0]
|
||||
rule1 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][1]
|
||||
rule0['geos'] = ['AF', 'EU', 'NA-US-CA']
|
||||
rule1['geos'] = ['NA', 'NA-US']
|
||||
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(record)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEquals(17, len(ret['answers']))
|
||||
# Deeply check the answers we have here
|
||||
# group the answers based on where they came from
|
||||
notes = defaultdict(list)
|
||||
for answer in ret['answers']:
|
||||
notes[answer['meta']['note']].append(answer)
|
||||
# Remove the meta and region part since it'll vary based on the
|
||||
# exact pool, that'll let us == them down below
|
||||
del answer['meta']
|
||||
del answer['region']
|
||||
|
||||
# Expected groups. iad has occurances in here: a country and region
|
||||
# that was split out based on targeting a continent and a state. It
|
||||
# finally has a catchall. Those are examples of the two ways pools get
|
||||
# expanded.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# lhr splits in two, with a region and country.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# well as both lhr georegion (for contients) and country. The first is
|
||||
# an example of a repeated target pool in a rule (only allowed when the
|
||||
# 2nd is a catchall.)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(['from:--default--', 'from:iad__catchall',
|
||||
'from:iad__country', 'from:iad__georegion',
|
||||
'from:lhr__country', 'from:lhr__georegion'],
|
||||
sorted(notes.keys()))
|
||||
|
||||
# All the iad's should match (after meta and region were removed)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(notes['from:iad__catchall'],
|
||||
notes['from:iad__country'])
|
||||
self.assertEquals(notes['from:iad__catchall'],
|
||||
notes['from:iad__georegion'])
|
||||
|
||||
# The lhrs should match each other too
|
||||
self.assertEquals(notes['from:lhr__georegion'],
|
||||
notes['from:lhr__country'])
|
||||
|
||||
# We have both country and region filter chain entries
|
||||
exp = Ns1Provider._FILTER_CHAIN_WITH_REGION_AND_COUNTRY(provider,
|
||||
True)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(ret['filters'], exp)
|
||||
|
||||
# and our region details match the expected behaviors/targeting
|
||||
self.assertEquals({
|
||||
'iad__catchall': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'note': 'rule-order:2'
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
'iad__country': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'country': ['US'],
|
||||
'note': 'rule-order:1'
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
'iad__georegion': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'georegion': ['US-CENTRAL', 'US-EAST', 'US-WEST'],
|
||||
'note': 'rule-order:1'
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
'lhr__country': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'note': 'fallback:iad rule-order:0',
|
||||
'us_state': ['CA']
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
'lhr__georegion': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'georegion': ['AFRICA', 'EUROPE'],
|
||||
'note': 'fallback:iad rule-order:0'
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}, ret['regions'])
|
||||
|
||||
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_sync')
|
||||
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
||||
@@ -1014,18 +1204,21 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
# Set geos to 'OC' in rules[0] (pool - 'lhr')
|
||||
# Check returned dict has list of countries under 'OC'
|
||||
rule0 = self.record.data['dynamic']['rules'][0]
|
||||
saved_geos = rule0['geos']
|
||||
record = self.record()
|
||||
rule0 = record.data['dynamic']['rules'][0]
|
||||
rule0['geos'] = ['OC']
|
||||
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(self.record)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(set(ret['regions']['lhr']['meta']['country']),
|
||||
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(record)
|
||||
|
||||
# Make sure the country list expanded into all the OC countries
|
||||
got = set(ret['regions']['lhr__country']['meta']['country'])
|
||||
self.assertEquals(got,
|
||||
Ns1Provider._CONTINENT_TO_LIST_OF_COUNTRIES['OC'])
|
||||
|
||||
# When rules has 'OC', it is converted to list of countries in the
|
||||
# params. Look if the returned filters is the filter chain with country
|
||||
self.assertEquals(ret['filters'],
|
||||
Ns1Provider._FILTER_CHAIN_WITH_COUNTRY(provider,
|
||||
True))
|
||||
rule0['geos'] = saved_geos
|
||||
|
||||
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitor_sync')
|
||||
@patch('octodns.provider.ns1.Ns1Provider._monitors_for')
|
||||
@@ -1051,19 +1244,20 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
]
|
||||
# This indirectly calls into _params_for_dynamic_A and tests the
|
||||
# handling to get there
|
||||
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(self.record)
|
||||
record = self.record()
|
||||
ret, _ = provider._params_for_A(record)
|
||||
|
||||
# Given that self.record has both country and region in the rules,
|
||||
# Given that record has both country and region in the rules,
|
||||
# the returned filter chain should be one with region and country
|
||||
self.assertEquals(ret['filters'],
|
||||
Ns1Provider._FILTER_CHAIN_WITH_REGION_AND_COUNTRY(
|
||||
provider, True))
|
||||
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(self.record)])
|
||||
monitors_for_mock.assert_has_calls([call(record)])
|
||||
monitors_sync_mock.assert_has_calls([
|
||||
call(self.record, '1.2.3.4', None),
|
||||
call(self.record, '2.3.4.5', None),
|
||||
call(self.record, '3.4.5.6', 'mid-3'),
|
||||
call(record, '1.2.3.4', None),
|
||||
call(record, '2.3.4.5', None),
|
||||
call(record, '3.4.5.6', 'mid-3'),
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
record = Record.new(self.zone, 'geo', {
|
||||
@@ -1111,13 +1305,13 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
# Test out a small, but realistic setup that covers all the options
|
||||
# We have country and region in the test config
|
||||
filters = provider._get_updated_filter_chain(True, True)
|
||||
catchall_pool_name = '{}{}'.format(provider.CATCHALL_PREFIX, 'iad')
|
||||
catchall_pool_name = 'iad__catchall'
|
||||
ns1_record = {
|
||||
'answers': [{
|
||||
'answer': ['3.4.5.6'],
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'priority': 1,
|
||||
'note': 'from:lhr',
|
||||
'note': 'from:lhr__country',
|
||||
},
|
||||
'region': 'lhr',
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
@@ -1169,14 +1363,24 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
'domain': 'unit.tests',
|
||||
'filters': filters,
|
||||
'regions': {
|
||||
'lhr': {
|
||||
# lhr will use the new-split style names (and that will require
|
||||
# combining in the code to produce the expected answer
|
||||
'lhr__georegion': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'note': 'rule-order:1 fallback:iad',
|
||||
'georegion': ['AFRICA'],
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
'lhr__country': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'note': 'rule-order:1 fallback:iad',
|
||||
'country': ['CA'],
|
||||
'georegion': ['AFRICA'],
|
||||
'us_state': ['OR'],
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
# iad will use the old style "plain" region naming. We won't
|
||||
# see mixed names like this in practice, but this should
|
||||
# exercise both paths
|
||||
'iad': {
|
||||
'meta': {
|
||||
'note': 'rule-order:2',
|
||||
@@ -1240,16 +1444,28 @@ class TestNs1ProviderDynamic(TestCase):
|
||||
data2 = provider._data_for_A('A', ns1_record)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(data, data2)
|
||||
|
||||
# Same answer if we have an old-style catchall name
|
||||
old_style_catchall_pool_name = 'catchall__iad'
|
||||
ns1_record['answers'][-2]['region'] = old_style_catchall_pool_name
|
||||
ns1_record['answers'][-1]['region'] = old_style_catchall_pool_name
|
||||
ns1_record['regions'][old_style_catchall_pool_name] = \
|
||||
ns1_record['regions'][catchall_pool_name]
|
||||
del ns1_record['regions'][catchall_pool_name]
|
||||
data3 = provider._data_for_dynamic_A('A', ns1_record)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(data, data2)
|
||||
|
||||
# Oceania test cases
|
||||
# 1. Full list of countries should return 'OC' in geos
|
||||
oc_countries = Ns1Provider._CONTINENT_TO_LIST_OF_COUNTRIES['OC']
|
||||
ns1_record['regions']['lhr']['meta']['country'] = list(oc_countries)
|
||||
ns1_record['regions']['lhr__country']['meta']['country'] = \
|
||||
list(oc_countries)
|
||||
data3 = provider._data_for_A('A', ns1_record)
|
||||
self.assertTrue('OC' in data3['dynamic']['rules'][0]['geos'])
|
||||
|
||||
# 2. Partial list of countries should return just those
|
||||
partial_oc_cntry_list = list(oc_countries)[:5]
|
||||
ns1_record['regions']['lhr']['meta']['country'] = partial_oc_cntry_list
|
||||
ns1_record['regions']['lhr__country']['meta']['country'] = \
|
||||
partial_oc_cntry_list
|
||||
data4 = provider._data_for_A('A', ns1_record)
|
||||
for c in partial_oc_cntry_list:
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ from unittest import TestCase
|
||||
from mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
from octodns.record import Create, Delete, Record, Update
|
||||
from octodns.provider.route53 import Route53Provider, _Route53GeoDefault, \
|
||||
_Route53DynamicValue, _Route53GeoRecord, _Route53Record, _mod_keyer, \
|
||||
_octal_replace
|
||||
from octodns.provider.route53 import Route53Provider, _Route53DynamicValue, \
|
||||
_Route53GeoDefault, _Route53GeoRecord, Route53ProviderException, \
|
||||
_Route53Record, _mod_keyer, _octal_replace
|
||||
from octodns.zone import Zone
|
||||
|
||||
from helpers import GeoProvider
|
||||
@@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
@@ -317,6 +318,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 42,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
@@ -330,6 +332,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
@@ -343,6 +346,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
@@ -357,6 +361,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}]
|
||||
@@ -1023,6 +1028,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
@@ -1036,6 +1042,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}]
|
||||
@@ -1059,6 +1066,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}]
|
||||
@@ -1108,6 +1116,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
@@ -1121,6 +1130,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}]
|
||||
@@ -1242,9 +1252,9 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEquals('42', id)
|
||||
stubber.assert_no_pending_responses()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_health_check_measure_latency(self):
|
||||
def test_health_check_provider_options(self):
|
||||
provider, stubber = self._get_stubbed_provider()
|
||||
record_true = Record.new(self.expected, 'a', {
|
||||
record = Record.new(self.expected, 'a', {
|
||||
'ttl': 61,
|
||||
'type': 'A',
|
||||
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
||||
@@ -1253,23 +1263,28 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
},
|
||||
'route53': {
|
||||
'healthcheck': {
|
||||
'measure_latency': True
|
||||
'measure_latency': True,
|
||||
'request_interval': 10,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
measure_latency = provider._healthcheck_measure_latency(record_true)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(measure_latency)
|
||||
latency = provider._healthcheck_measure_latency(record)
|
||||
interval = provider._healthcheck_request_interval(record)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(latency)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(10, interval)
|
||||
|
||||
record_default = Record.new(self.expected, 'a', {
|
||||
'ttl': 61,
|
||||
'type': 'A',
|
||||
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
||||
})
|
||||
measure_latency = provider._healthcheck_measure_latency(record_default)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(measure_latency)
|
||||
latency = provider._healthcheck_measure_latency(record_default)
|
||||
interval = provider._healthcheck_request_interval(record_default)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(latency)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(10, interval)
|
||||
|
||||
record_false = Record.new(self.expected, 'a', {
|
||||
record = Record.new(self.expected, 'a', {
|
||||
'ttl': 61,
|
||||
'type': 'A',
|
||||
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
||||
@@ -1278,15 +1293,35 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
},
|
||||
'route53': {
|
||||
'healthcheck': {
|
||||
'measure_latency': False
|
||||
'measure_latency': False,
|
||||
'request_interval': 30,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
measure_latency = provider._healthcheck_measure_latency(record_false)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(measure_latency)
|
||||
latency = provider._healthcheck_measure_latency(record)
|
||||
interval = provider._healthcheck_request_interval(record)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(latency)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(30, interval)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_create_health_checks_measure_latency(self):
|
||||
record_invalid = Record.new(self.expected, 'a', {
|
||||
'ttl': 61,
|
||||
'type': 'A',
|
||||
'value': '1.2.3.4',
|
||||
'octodns': {
|
||||
'healthcheck': {
|
||||
},
|
||||
'route53': {
|
||||
'healthcheck': {
|
||||
'request_interval': 20,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(Route53ProviderException):
|
||||
interval = provider._healthcheck_request_interval(record_invalid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_create_health_checks_provider_options(self):
|
||||
provider, stubber = self._get_stubbed_provider()
|
||||
|
||||
health_check_config = {
|
||||
@@ -1296,7 +1331,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'IPAddress': '1.2.3.4',
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': False,
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 30,
|
||||
'ResourcePath': '/_dns',
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS'
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1335,7 +1370,8 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
},
|
||||
'route53': {
|
||||
'healthcheck': {
|
||||
'measure_latency': False
|
||||
'measure_latency': False,
|
||||
'request_interval': 30
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1344,7 +1380,9 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
value = record.geo['AF'].values[0]
|
||||
id = provider.get_health_check_id(record, value, True)
|
||||
ml = provider.health_checks[id]['HealthCheckConfig']['MeasureLatency']
|
||||
self.assertEqual(False, ml)
|
||||
ri = provider.health_checks[id]['HealthCheckConfig']['RequestInterval']
|
||||
self.assertFalse(ml)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(30, ri)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_health_check_gc(self):
|
||||
provider, stubber = self._get_stubbed_provider()
|
||||
@@ -1436,6 +1474,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
@@ -1449,6 +1488,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
@@ -1462,6 +1502,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}]
|
||||
@@ -1639,6 +1680,7 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
@@ -1742,7 +1784,8 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'ResourcePath': '/_dns',
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
@@ -1890,7 +1933,8 @@ class TestRoute53Provider(TestCase):
|
||||
'ResourcePath': '/_dns',
|
||||
'Type': 'HTTPS',
|
||||
'Port': 443,
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True
|
||||
'MeasureLatency': True,
|
||||
'RequestInterval': 10,
|
||||
},
|
||||
'HealthCheckVersion': 2,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2167,7 +2167,8 @@ class TestRecordValidation(TestCase):
|
||||
'target': 'foo.bar.baz.'
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.assertEquals(['invalid name'], ctx.exception.reasons)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(['invalid name for SRV record'],
|
||||
ctx.exception.reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
# missing priority
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ from unittest import TestCase
|
||||
from octodns.source.axfr import AxfrSource, AxfrSourceZoneTransferFailed, \
|
||||
ZoneFileSource, ZoneFileSourceLoadFailure
|
||||
from octodns.zone import Zone
|
||||
from octodns.record import ValidationError
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAxfrSource(TestCase):
|
||||
@@ -70,3 +71,16 @@ class TestZoneFileSource(TestCase):
|
||||
self.source.populate(zone)
|
||||
self.assertEquals('The DNS zone has no NS RRset at its origin.',
|
||||
text_type(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
# Records are not to RFC (lenient=False)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValidationError) as ctx:
|
||||
zone = Zone('invalid.records.', [])
|
||||
self.source.populate(zone)
|
||||
self.assertEquals('Invalid record _invalid.invalid.records.\n'
|
||||
' - invalid name for SRV record',
|
||||
text_type(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
# Records are not to RFC, but load anyhow (lenient=True)
|
||||
invalid = Zone('invalid.records.', [])
|
||||
self.source.populate(invalid, lenient=True)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(12, len(invalid.records))
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
||||
$ORIGIN invalid.records.
|
||||
@ 3600 IN SOA ns1.invalid.records. root.invalid.records. (
|
||||
2018071501 ; Serial
|
||||
3600 ; Refresh (1 hour)
|
||||
600 ; Retry (10 minutes)
|
||||
604800 ; Expire (1 week)
|
||||
3600 ; NXDOMAIN ttl (1 hour)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
; NS Records
|
||||
@ 3600 IN NS ns1.invalid.records.
|
||||
@ 3600 IN NS ns2.invalid.records.
|
||||
under 3600 IN NS ns1.invalid.records.
|
||||
under 3600 IN NS ns2.invalid.records.
|
||||
|
||||
; SRV Records
|
||||
_srv._tcp 600 IN SRV 10 20 30 foo-1.invalid.records.
|
||||
_srv._tcp 600 IN SRV 10 20 30 foo-2.invalid.records.
|
||||
_invalid 600 IN SRV 10 20 30 foo-3.invalid.records.
|
||||
|
||||
; TXT Records
|
||||
txt 600 IN TXT "Bah bah black sheep"
|
||||
txt 600 IN TXT "have you any wool."
|
||||
txt 600 IN TXT "v=DKIM1;k=rsa;s=email;h=sha256;p=A/kinda+of/long/string+with+numb3rs"
|
||||
|
||||
; MX Records
|
||||
mx 300 IN MX 10 smtp-4.invalid.records.
|
||||
mx 300 IN MX 20 smtp-2.invalid.records.
|
||||
mx 300 IN MX 30 smtp-3.invalid.records.
|
||||
mx 300 IN MX 40 smtp-1.invalid.records.
|
||||
|
||||
; A Records
|
||||
@ 300 IN A 1.2.3.4
|
||||
@ 300 IN A 1.2.3.5
|
||||
www 300 IN A 2.2.3.6
|
||||
wwww.sub 300 IN A 2.2.3.6
|
||||
|
||||
; AAAA Records
|
||||
aaaa 600 IN AAAA 2601:644:500:e210:62f8:1dff:feb8:947a
|
||||
|
||||
; CNAME Records
|
||||
cname 300 IN CNAME invalid.records.
|
||||
included 300 IN CNAME invalid.records.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user