docs: Some changes in formulation (#7458)

1. "is ..." -> "has to do with ..."
2. reformulation of the sentence: it wasn't complete, because after "Thanks to one of our users, Dan Brown ..." there was just "additional information" about Dan Brown but not what we actually have thanks to him. I think this formulation makes it a little bit easier to understand the sentence
3. cpu architect -> CPU architecture (i thought it was the common way to state it. Also, abbreviations are generally uppercase)

Hope this helps :)
This commit is contained in:
gitwuethrich
2017-10-10 09:58:28 +02:00
committed by Daniel Preussker
parent b3185b792e
commit b46735b9c2

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
source: General/Welcome-to-Observium-users.md
LibreNMS is a fork of Observium. The reason for the fork is nothing to do
LibreNMS is a fork of Observium. The reason for the fork has nothing to do
with Observium's [move to community vs. paid versions][1]. It is simply
that we have different priorities and values to the Observium development
team. We decided to fork (reluctantly) because we like using Observium,
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ information about the kind of community we're trying to promote.
LibreNMS was forked from [the last GPL-licensed version of Observium][3].
Thanks to one of our users Dan Brown who has written a migration script to be able move your Observium install over to LibreNMS [Dan Brown][10]. This also takes care of moving from one cpu architect to another. Give it a try :)
Thanks to one of our users, Dan Brown, who has written a [migration script][10], you can easily move your Observium install over to LibreNMS. This also takes care of moving from one CPU architecture to another. Give it a try :)
How LibreNMS will be different from Observium: